E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Eilema griseola (Hubner, 1803)

Имаго  (Eilema griseola)

Taxonomy

class Insecta subclass Pterygota infraclass Neoptera superorder Holometabola order Lepidoptera superfamily Noctuoidea family Erebidae subfamily Arctiinae tribe Lithosiini subtribe Lithosiina genus Eilema → species Eilema griseola

Species name(s)

Eilema griseola (Hubner, 1803) = Eilema griseolum (Hubner, [1803]) = Bombyx griseola Hübner, [1803] = Lithosia flava Haworth, 1809 = Lithosia plumbeolata Stephens, 1829 = Lithosia stramineola Doubleday, 1847 = pallida Lempke, 1961 = aurantiaca Lempke, 1961 = Ilema griseola. [3, 9, 10]

Dingy Footman.

urn:lsid:insecta.pro:taxonomy:6703

Expansion

This species marks on the maps: 5.

Zoogeographical regions

Palaearctic.

Russia regions

#1. Kaliningradsky; #3. Karelsky; #4. Evropeisky Severo-Zapadny; #6. Evropeisky Severo-Vostochny; #7. Evropeisky yuzhno-tayozhny; #8. Evropeisky Tsentralny; #9. Evropeisky Tsentralno-Chernozyomny; #10. Sredne-Volzhsky; #11. Volgo-Donsky; #17. Yuzhno-Uralsky; #19. Sredneobsky; #20. Yuzhno-Zapadnosibirsky; #22. Krasnoyarsky; #23. Predaltaisky; #24. Gorno-Altaisky; #26. Predbaikalsky; #28. Zabaikalsky; #36. Sredne-Amursky*; #37. Nizhne-Amursky; #38. Sakhalin; #40. Primorsky.

* An asterisk denotes a region for which the species is listed as an migrant or information that requires additional checking.

Wingspan

30—34 mm.

Primary colors

Yellow, Blue, Brown/Gray/Black.

Flight time

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Имаго  (Eilema griseola)

Detailed information with references

Distribution

  • Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Great Britain, Hungary, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and the Soviet Union - the European part, Finland, France, Czech Republic, Switzerland, Sweden, Estonia , Yugoslavia. [1].
  • Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the British Isles, France, Germany, Denmark (mainland), Spain (mainland), Italy (mainland), Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Moldova, Netherlands Channel Islands, Poland, Portugal (mainland), Romania, Russia, Slovakia,Slovenia, Ukraine, Finland, France (mainland), Czech Republic, Switzerland, Sweden, Estonia. [10].
  • Regions of the Russian Federation: the Volga-Don, Gorno-Altaisk, the European North-East, the European North-West, the European Central Black Earth, the European Central European South taiga, Trans-Baikal, Kaliningrad, Karelia, Krasnoyarsk, Nizhny-Amur, Prealtay, of Baikal, Primorye, Sakhalin,Mid-Amur (?) Mid-Volzhsky, Sredneobskaya, South West Siberian, South Ural. [3].

Imago Habitus and Differences from alike species

  • Wingspan: 30-34 mm. [PC93].

Imago lifespan

  • June August [PC93].

Larva food plants / other food objects

  • Lichens. [28].

Pupa

  • Lifetime pupa 2 weeks. Since the end of the first decade of June until the end of the third (10.06--30.06). Next comes the imago. [PC238].

Subspecies of Eilema griseola

Authors

Initial species uploading to the site: Peter Khramov.

Photos: Vitaly Gumenuk, Boris Lariushin.

Text data: Peter Khramov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Yuri Semejkin.

The species characteristics formalization: Peter Khramov, Vasiliy Feoktistov.

References

Comments

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments

07.07.2015 19:08, Fedor Ovechkin

:)

07.07.2015 18:21, Yuri Semejkin

Theodore, Basil! Do you have any pictures on that you see, and more specifically on the date of shooting of different authors. And immediately expand the geography and time of appearance of adults coincide with Primorye. And some generalizations looking at pictures is already possible to make at least preliminary.
Fedor! Do not talk about the seasons, they are "great weather" do not.Each vegetable one time. Yes, there are deviations in some years, but they are not great ...
Ex monographs dig too somehow doubtful. The monograph, a monograph, but sources sometimes do not understand who is who and when perepisyval.Kto something might not agree, but look around and see what we all use.Sites determinants of overseas Japanese, Korean, Chinese. With defining literature similarly. Where domestic? In the 20th century did not create, in the 21 is also not particularly seen .....

07.07.2015 16:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, let me answer for Fedor. On the page of the form must be exactly the generalized information on species as a whole and not for individual or multiple instances of a single point. It is much more appropriate to write it on a page with a specific photo. An example of my comment: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40849 That is how I see the picture and Fedor is absolutely right.

07.07.2015 16:24, Alexandr Zhakov

Fedor, which indicates that it is a generalization of the information? This is a personal message to the "detailed information" and is very honestly :) And there is a human desire to seek the monographs aggregated data.

07.07.2015 16:03, Fedor Ovechkin

I agree with Basil on a single observation in one part of the range can not make a generalization for the species as a whole. Namely, the total for the kind of information is seen on this page. If Yuri took the trouble to describe in this report all the circumstances of the individual case (there was something there somewhere, observation of so many copies.for so some seasons), then it may be, it would be appropriate!

07.07.2015 14:17, Alexandr Zhakov

Yuri. I do not think printsepialno if they are connected to the group. But it's better to specify, since the rank of the taxon may vary.and erect it in the rank of a species, butterflies pass, and caterpillars and pupae remain with the old view :)
Basil, when there is not any information on the pupal stage, the personal observations can not be superfluous, complemented by a generalization of literature, fine. A photo on a page they will find no one.

07.07.2015 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yuri, her imago flies from June to August (ie all summer recklessly), and most likely in two generations. That is why I see no reason to prostanovka specific dates it is on the page of a particular type .. Ref copies. - Please, but only on his page and nothing more.

07.07.2015 12:37, Yuri Semejkin

Basil ! In fact, in the pictures, it was stated that at this point of the 5 tracks, and not one instance. Two of the five were taken to the cultivation and pupated one day June 10, 2015 I hope no one will dispute that the three remaining tracks pupated nature in those days, a tolerance of a few days and everything. From one of the imago # 41249 # 41250 published June 21, 2015 g, and from others. # 41246 # 41141 came out of 06.23.15Thus during the pupal stage does not exceed 2 weeks, about the time adult flight in these pictures did not say anything.
And now for your snapshots. For example, # 40890. Your shooting date June 23, 2015 Fresh butterfly and if you look at the time-my # 41141, we will see that it is also charged June 23, 2015 This Basil has a system that isthe emergence of adults from the pupae in the Primorsky Territory and the Moscow region is the same ...... and they can fly for a long time, depending on the region until the late autumn. And maybe have 2 adult generation? I explain why -Prihodilos hear caterpillar overwinters. Himself a disk imaging are not met, if anyone has skinte.Alexander ! You're a special thank you for the accuracy of the wording of time the pupa stage. Maybe it makes sense to make a separate window?
By subspecies. The imago have subspecies, and caterpillars and pupae, too, that if you want?

07.07.2015 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, for information related to a single instance (and in this case it is definitely him and assigned) is the "author comment", which is under a particular image. And the page type is not necessary to make. This is my personal opinion and it'll stay.

07.07.2015 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov

I have two questions. :)
By Yuri first: The date the form on the page pupa 10.06- 30 .06.
butterflies and photo 21. 06. and 23 .06 should be appropriate.And then a clarification: not Lifetime pupa , and Time pupal stage
By the second Basil: And where it says that the page can not give a specific type of information? To do this, and there is a function "Add Video Info", where everyone can add their information. The fact that there is a generalization of a particular source of it is not the fault of the author.He adds his points and it's a private message for its observations. :) Only Yuri. it was necessary to specify that it is for some subspecies. :)

07.07.2015 10:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov

And tea is not the first year live :)
Date the picture pupa look:
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41249
As an example of my personal observation: imago of this kind from one point collected in this year's series of the normal from early June to the 4th of July (and will long flight of). She stretched and the flight of the date respectively from pupae are different.

07.07.2015 10:01, Peter Khramov

And how do you know that on the unit?

07.07.2015 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov

"With the end of the first decade of June until the end of the third (10.06--30.06). Next comes the imago." Message. Yuri Semeykin.
Yuri, here is the information and even dates should not have put as a sign of species. It is based on a single item and therefore to him should be and is. A page of the form of this kind should not be ad-libbing.Here it is necessary to bring the summary data for species as a whole.

24.06.2015 12:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Wingspan: No formalized data → 30—34 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July, August.

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.