E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Specifics of determining fot the example of C. ladonides http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6380

Community and Forum → Website news and updates → Specifics of determining fot the example of C. ladonides http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6380

Peter Khramov, 01.04.2013 13:20

So, formed an unusual situation for the site: the definition, though imprecise, like there, with a few people, but the author foty him (definition) disagrees. And neither one nor the other side of each other is not convinced. Well, that no offense. Nonetheless.
With fotoy ought to do something. Either leave in uncertain or transferring inaccurate.The first option is bad because, in fact, hanging Fota no formal definition, when in fact anything to do it (the definition) is available. In addition, with the views of the people and more, including more professional than the author of the picture.On the other hand, the author is probably still has some rights to have his phot call or not call, and he had a specific area, not every "Europeans" understandable.Because I stand on this issue a separate discussion, that there was some course of action for the future, which all agree:
Priority in these situations, the author foty or community site?Interested vysheozvuchennyh opinion not only of the parties but also all users of the site, more, I repeat, it is not a specific fote, and in principle a template for the future.

Comments

01.04.2013 14:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Wrap in ill-defined.

01.04.2013 14:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I agree with Dmitry. It is necessary to do so to clarify the situation.

02.04.2013 0:07, Yuri Semejkin

Leave it undefined. Why is that? It seems that in the discussions agreed that the species is required to determine the top and underside of the same definition osobi.Chto only one top or underside is unrealistic. And endure, just to move ....

02.04.2013 2:37, Peter Khramov

Remove?

02.04.2013 2:45, Alexandr Zhakov

Keep Dmitry and Vasily.

02.04.2013 15:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin

The essence of the dispute is not clear. Butterfly determined - albeit inaccurately. A man appeared to think 100% - to determine exactly indicate the error. Let hanging in inaccurate than sink into uncertain.

02.04.2013 16:06, Peter Khramov

The essence of the dispute as follows: what to do if the butterfly is defined, though inaccurately, and the author foty with the definition does not agree. Whether spit on the definition, or to the author, or remove Fautua avoid damage karma.

02.04.2013 16:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin

The concept of an inaccurate determination of, in my opinion, means that someone does not agree, or not sure of the definition. In this case, the author does not agree, and certain inaccuracies. It seems simple.

03.04.2013 12:03, Yuri Semejkin

Whether spit on the definition, or to the author, or remove Fautua avoid damage karma.
Peter and Karma is what you got. The Law of Cause and Effect manifests itself. In another-who aspires to

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.