All Insecta.pro Comments

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539... 561

28.06.2011 22:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9497

Went to "identified successfully".

26.06.2011 18:24, Peter Khramov: comment on Web poll

Although the voting finished a fortnight ago, now finally, there are results. So, most people voted for the interactive map with editing marks and more detailed species descriptions and other taxa. Though less than for the first two things, but there are also votes for image section, better catalog and number of species. Details: image section is permanently getting better, there will be some ...

25.06.2011 12:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9442

To go.

23.06.2011 23:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9460

Moved.

23.06.2011 19:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9461

C. fraxini? (Evidently, this is the same item as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9460/).

22.06.2011 17:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9435

To go.

20.06.2011 20:27, Peter Khramov: comment on Hyles gallii

Igor, "May, June, July," means that the species is found at this time at least for part of the area. This does not mean that at other times he found no. Due to the fact that restrictions on the system or on the geography on the site is not, it is necessary to apply this approach. ZY Added Old pro in August under your imenenm.

20.06.2011 16:57, Peter Khramov: comment on Catalogue: the "Reset" button

This new option is very handy when you need to get back to default features, so you do that easily pressing the "Reset" button.

19.06.2011 19:16, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #9387

This species is identified correctly.

19.06.2011 18:44, Peter Khramov: comment on Please, help to identify a butterfly and a caterpillar.

So, there are answers: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9416/ and http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9417/.

19.06.2011 18:43, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9417

To go.

19.06.2011 18:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9416

Moved.

18.06.2011 21:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3484

Moved.

18.06.2011 21:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9357

Fine, goes to euphrosyne too.

18.06.2011 21:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9356

Goes to euphrosyne.

18.06.2011 21:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9400

Moved. The first photo of this species on the website.

18.06.2011 21:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9404

Moved a picture.

18.06.2011 21:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9403

To go.

17.06.2011 14:01, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9382

To go.

15.06.2011 11:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9380

Moved.

15.06.2011 11:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9133

Moved to.

13.06.2011 21:30, Peter Khramov: comment on New references

A dozen plus in that way...

13.06.2011 20:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9360

To go.

13.06.2011 20:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9361

Moved.

13.06.2011 20:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9312

Moved to L. phlaeas.

13.06.2011 20:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9285

To go.

12.06.2011 23:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9287

Moved to X. exsoleta.

12.06.2011 23:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9286

If I got right, meant exsoleta. To go.

10.06.2011 21:30, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4100

This species is identified correctly.

10.06.2011 21:25, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4099

This species is identified correctly.

10.06.2011 21:25, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4098

Approve, the very X.vetusta can have such bright red spiracles alongside the black-white lateral line.

10.06.2011 14:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3402

Shot moved to Orgyia antiquoides.

09.06.2011 15:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8253

Moved.

09.06.2011 15:33, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #9327

This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 15:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #7411

This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 15:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #7410

This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 14:31, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #9230

This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 13:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9209

To go.

09.06.2011 13:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9210

Moved.

09.06.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9026

Meh. Could be a picture for a new species...

09.06.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6749

Goes to identified.

09.06.2011 7:55, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #9094

This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 0:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9315

Ok, moved.

08.06.2011 23:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9020

Good, moved.

08.06.2011 21:44, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #9069

This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2011 21:36, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #9289

This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2011 21:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #9288

This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2011 16:18, Peter Khramov: comment on Catalog feature parameters: "AND" or "OR"

Lately one using Lepidoptera.pro catalog could choose whether this feature parameter or that, like "red" color or "yellow". Now it's possible to choose one parameter as well as both altogether, like "red" or "yellow", or "red AND yellow". Thus, search's getting more flexible, and easier for dummies who now might prefer catalog to the image gallery for identifying.