E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

10.01.2015 16:41, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37987

alternata, vnimmatelno I have not looked, but I think that all of the author's photo notata, and alternata

09.01.2015 19:04, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37865

alternata.

09.01.2015 12:45, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37994

I would call it good-Zanclognatha lunalis

09.01.2015 12:31, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #6809

This and all the photos are Gumenyuk A.nigricornis, I think so

09.01.2015 12:12, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #38035

Why not alternata?

08.01.2015 22:17, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #23097

God forgive me, dear A.Matovza for my doubts, but I think that it Archanara and most likely, neurica, if there is no other similar. There is another view of the specimen., To it is also true.

30.12.2014 18:31, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37398

Idaea seriata

30.12.2014 18:20, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37410

This is the same specimens. That frontal photo

30.12.2014 18:14, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37432

A bold statement. There's a picture, I think, the same specimens. In Serbia, there are of course both, but not raspralennuyu determine whether it is possible? For us it would be triplasia.

30.12.2014 17:12, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37454

crepuscularia

30.12.2014 17:12, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37437

H.punctinalis

30.12.2014 17:11, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37441

M.albula

30.12.2014 17:10, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37439

M.albula

30.12.2014 17:07, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37386

Meganola albula

30.12.2014 16:50, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37657

Sasha decided to look again at this, given your question ,. I think you're right, this is not it. Upon closer inspection (size does not feel), I think Ph.transversata, although the picture is to be thrown.

30.12.2014 15:47, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37458

H.punctinalis

30.12.2014 15:38, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37478

Cyclophora linearia-likely, but this shot ....

30.12.2014 15:31, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37480

E.crepuscularia

30.12.2014 15:29, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #26384

Ectropis crepuscularia

30.12.2014 15:25, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37470

S.immutata

30.12.2014 15:22, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37587

This-H.tersata

30.12.2014 15:00, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37608

If you believe GME 3, it may be likely S.luridata

30.12.2014 13:47, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37657

Gymnoscelis rufifasciata, if you can learn something

30.12.2014 13:40, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37648

Ectropis crepuscularia

30.12.2014 13:36, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37676

Camptogramma bilineata

30.12.2014 13:24, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37774

I doubt I dumayu- shabby comes

30.12.2014 13:06, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37674

Idaea deversaria

29.12.2014 22:56, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #33013

Nu.navernoe so. It is difficult to doubt the determination of the leading specialist,

29.12.2014 17:58, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37261

Hypena rostralis

29.12.2014 17:38, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37161

Acontia candefacta

29.12.2014 16:07, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37110

Eilema sororcula

29.12.2014 16:04, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #37111

Idaea rusticata

26.12.2014 11:11, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #15263

Types of genital well vary in females and molekulyarke (it's sort of the female). So it is difficult to see the differences, though, if you have a series of both and take into account written below, then assign a small probability of error is possible.1 Spreading (meaning luridata) by Hausmann (GME 3) -Yug Russia, southern Urals and a point somewhere in the region of Tatarstan by Sineva have ...

20.12.2014 13:24, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #9815

No, of course is Dichagyris signifera, very hard to believe that so defined before

18.12.2014 13:43, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #33013

Eupithecia sophia-male, female previously opredelennaya-

14.12.2014 15:58, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #29644

Looked uncertain vulgata revised and at the same time remaining. Here is the first time rasmotrenii doubt Now I come to the conclusion that the still-virgaureata

14.12.2014 14:27, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #4388

E.vulgata

12.12.2014 23:16, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #28938

http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=68445 http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Biston_robustus_robustus.html variability here, there are double

12.12.2014 21:20, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #28938

lower fasting and H - "is not specified in Sinev for 37 regions - robustum - 6 copies."

12.12.2014 20:58, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #28938

In fact, without a date, it is not quite good, but why robustum not fit? Some sources even its name-calling and robustus

12.12.2014 12:00, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #36315

Well, NE 5 is written in sort of different types, although in the past was considered a subspecies solidaginis

12.12.2014 10:43, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #36315

It seems as synonyms

30.11.2014 9:49, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #31428

exanthemata

22.11.2014 19:59, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #31128

http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/persons/vasilenko/54.pdf

22.11.2014 14:24, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #31128

Earophila pseudobadiata, Vasilenko description in 2007. I think so.

21.11.2014 9:41, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #35441

unangulata

18.11.2014 12:02, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #15262

It is likely mucronata. Hausmann (GME 3) general luridata leads only to the south of Russia and the southern Urals, possibly due to lack of data

06.11.2014 19:29, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #34886

I guess you're right

03.11.2014 18:25, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #34760

I'm sorry, but you have another butterfly, neraspravlennye here like on the link provided

03.11.2014 17:53, Basil Sergienko: comment on photo #34760

There are so easily determined such difficult group, it seems to me, it does not add to the authority's website. Since there are not all true, I think, I decided to see the available Old. In total, according to the valid sheet of taxa (for 2007), in-kind Pingasa 45 species and subspecies of a pile, the series is very similar to my mind straightened butterfly is a different kind.I would suggest ...

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.