Insecta.pro Community
Buck
Female
There is information that such a spot just in the male should be: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30010001.html http://flutters.org/home/photogallery/index.php?level=picture&id=1851
Basil, here too, male and female
There are different instances in the group, perhaps even of different sex
It should be in the same group with the # 38968 and put the male and female
Alexander, and what is opposed to females?
Peter, please replace this picture №33614, if so, retaining the old number.
It should be combined into a group with 11942
Alexander, I think, that your copy - it's a male E. core godartii f. layardi (http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30270020.html)
Good!
Alexander, in this photo and photo №42372 shows the same specimen, top and bottom view respectively. Indeed, if we do not take into account that there is a kind of Euploea orontobates Fruhstorfer, 1910, the most this instance resembles E. core. In determining the use of the following materials; http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30255001.html Please note that it is the female (photo №42373) and a ...
This comment implies that the author does not object to the transfer of an additional photo in the gallery. The problem in fact is not far off!
Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition
Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition
Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition
Spialia galba
Spialia galba
Spialia galba
Invalid combined into a group with photo # 19833
Lampides boeticus
Lampides boeticus
According to this source ([9] Tree of Life (funet.fi), 2012), there is a subspecies Z. o. sangra (Moore, [1866]). Please add.
In connection with the innovations, can I tie it on their own photo to the genusPieris? If not, please do so moderators.
Vasily rights, I have the same thing happened before the hyphen is set manually.
Can habitat will: open, xerophytic community near suburban areas of butterflies were there Lycaena thersamon, Hyponephele lupinus, Pontia edusa, Iphiclides podalirius?
:) Dilettantes excusable on the abdomen do not watch! Type correctly defined, have fun.
Undecided, just a guess, Basil on photo # 33972 male with the same color, and photo # 33970 female on the other. If agreed, the right to information to the photo set. Probably just the variability in color.
Male?
Not measured, unfortunately! Yes, and I do not remember, it was a year ago. Only on the flower (inflorescence) can navigate. I do not mind the cabbage.
Pieris rapae?
Neptis rivularis?
Neptis rivularis?
And characteristically, new species are often described in those taxa that are popular with collectors (in the broad sense). Communication with commerce on the face, and the theory of evolution - alas!
As for the taxonomy, especially at the level of species, genera, in my opinion, works recognized authoritative opinions of individual authors. Communication with the theory of evolution is not captured.
Not at all, not the whole world.
Basil, the world continues to live with ... Darwin?
Euphydryas ichnea
Is it possible to formalize the data dissemination in the region to this kind displayed in the directory when searching?
Not solved it now!
Brenthis hecate
:)
I agree with Basil on a single observation in one part of the range can not make a generalization for the species as a whole. Namely, the total for the kind of information is seen on this page. If Yuri took the trouble to describe in this report all the circumstances of the individual case (there was something there somewhere, observation of so many copies.for so some seasons), then it may be, it ...
Autographa gamm?
Zygaena osterodensis
I think that the definition of the copies. (photo # 29278 and # 29280) mistake. It does not match any coloring or area; http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/chazara/ http://www.eurobutterflies.com/sp/prieuri.php Perhaps itChazara enervata. The same applies to the copies. on photo # 29281 - # 29282
Melanargia russiae
Boloria dia?
Agapeta hamana
https://www.google.ru/maps/place/7514.+Sk.+No:9,+%C4%B0stiklal,+80020+Osmaniye+Merkez%2FOsmaniye,+%D0%A2%D1%83%D1%80%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F/@60.9524192,76.8474501,286m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x152f2028586ace37:0xeadf3c868a4d6ecf?hl=ru
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (28.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:50, P. Khramov: Confidently identified → Tentativel...
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Streets: insects names
- Caterpillar hair can cause abortions in Australian mares
