Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122... 141
Goes to a new species.
To go.
Moved.
Yeah, yeah... Which one...
Euclidia glyphica?
Angerona prunaria?
Guys, I feel like there is another name of this species at the website, so no need to add new one to the database. Am I right, or should Resapamea hedeni yet be added?
People, suggest something if can, huh?
Ok, moved.
Andrey, do you mind?
Corrected.
Ok, ok. Yet he said "uncertain" ;--)
Ok, moved.
Yeah, yeah. Moved.
Goes to identified.
Went to "identified successfully".
Why not surely?..
To go.
Ok, moved.
Moved.
Moved.
C. fraxini? (Evidently, this is the same item as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9460/).
C. fraxini? (The same item as there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9460/).
C. fraxini?
Bug?
To go.
Moved.
Igor, "May, June, July," means that the species is found at this time at least for part of the area. This does not mean that at other times he found no. Due to the fact that restrictions on the system or on the geography on the site is not, it is necessary to apply this approach. ZY Added Old pro in August under your imenenm.
To go.
Moved.
Caja?
Ok, thanks, moved.
Moved.
Fine, goes to euphrosyne too.
Goes to euphrosyne.
Moved. The first photo of this species on the website.
Moved a picture.
To go.
To go.
Moved.
Moved to.
Moved.
Sinapis?
Sinapis?
Sinapis?
To go.
Moved.
Moved to L. phlaeas.
To go.
Evgeny, if it's the same beast as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9356/, IMHO turns to IMO, or?
Next page