Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1
Пилильщик
Пилильщик
Судя по лысой голове это пилильщик
Why, I like Vlad so much. It's very him who identified 99% of my moths, and I do appreciate that. I supposed to sort them out since this photo illustrates both species.
Probably, Scoparia pyralella.
May this be Sciota rhenella? A pro to come and sort out photos of these two species.
I don't ID anything myself. They help me on molbiol.ru. When possible, I recheck the info.
Likely Ectropis crepuscularia.
I think this is Actinotia polyodon.
What objections may rookie have? :-))) Tomorrow, the day after I'll finish uploading moths and then will show up in September-October with a new catch.
I've got 22 shots of Rhyacionia (buoliana and pinicolana all mingled). Don't know, what they differ with (can't see myself), so keep them in one place :-(
Double, might be removed.
This double to delete.
Done.
I got it labeled as this, can't remember who made the ID. Might be mistake, they're similar. Some real pro's conclusion needed.
Why there is antiopa?
Can't make everything right on the first try, neither see always what pics are already added. Some shots I upload when the present ones of small size and can't be zoomed. As for worn-out, not sure such can't be used for ID, can't always have just emerged. As for extras, please remove freely :-)
The original name used on upload should be saved or I get it named and ID'ed wrongly what's bad. Many websites keep all the renames.
Would be really to keep the first name saved so I could later revise the photo in my archive if it was ID'ed wrongly. Otherwise how can I now find it in my archive with thousands of photos?
That is some beetle crawling, some Staphylinidae. They happen to fly to the light as well as mosquitoes, sometimes it's hard to avoid their being shot together with moths. Can they be removed later on in Photoshop, not sure if it should be done?
Why not put that to Acronicta rumicis? Or am I wrong?
Agree, my mistake.
Pleased, I identified that right.
Glad to know my identifying is successful.
Glad to know I identified that right.
Agree.
Approve.
Agree.
Approve.
Agree.
Agree.
Approve.
Agree.
Agree.
Can be, can be.
This species is identified correctly.
Agree.
Probably, Z. loti.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
My mistake, was shot at Voronezh region, Pavlovsky hood, Petrovka village neighborhood, Shypov forest.
This species is identified correctly.
Hard to say, but seems to be identified correctly.
Pyralidae.
Thanks for identifying.
Included in the Red Book of the Moscow region
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (26.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
- 13:02, P. Khramov: Bombus → Bombus sylvestris....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Streets: insects names
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Male secrets: coremata, penis, phalloblaster and... alcohol
