Insecta.pro Community
Sympetrum ?baccha, female
Sympetrum baccha, male
Lestes sponsa, female
Coenagrion sp. female
Aeshna sp., female
Aeshna ?crenata, female
?Ischnura elegans, ♀
Ischnura elegans
Calopteryx splendens, ♀
Calopteryx splendens, ♀
Calopteryx splendens, ♀
IMHO yes.
Oh, good life, I did not know him. Thank you. How much shorter mask simpekm have - I do not know. IMHO if shorter, slightly. In general, in this shot, I would not have taken significantly distinguished from halkolestesov simpekm. I called pedisku the most, in my opinion, the likely choice for the Moscow region.Or maybe from that brought imago larvae, and we head to break? :) What is the ...
Calopteryx ?virgo, ♂
Calopteryx ?virgo, ♂
The transfer did not happen? Failure?
?? Cordulia aenea
Perhaps Chalcolestes sp. (But did they do from the Moscow region?). But IMHO possible Sympecma sp. And judging by geography, S. paedisca - the most likely possibility. Or am I missing something of the sort? By the way, the female image. :)
Pyrrhosoma nymphula
Corrected data. Lestes viridis (Vander Linden, 1825) → Chalcolestes viridis (Vander Linden, 1825).
The taxons were merged. Lestes viridis and Lestes viridis were merged.
Corrected data. Chalcolestes parvidens Artobolevskii, 1929 → (Artobolevskii, 1929).
Corrected data. Lestes parvidens Artobolevskii, 1929 → Chalcolestes parvidens Artobolevskii, 1929.
Corrected data. Lestes parvidens Artobolevsky 1929 → Artobolevskii, 1929.
Aeshna crenata ♀
Aeshna crenata ♀
Sympetrum risi ♂
Sympetrum danae, ♂
Yet more Calopteryx virgo :) (inaccurately?)
OK, Irina, thank you. I also thought a lot :) and decided that probably you are right and I was wrong. Rather, it is Virgo. I would still put the imprecise definition.
Libellula quadrimaculata ♂
Libellula quadrimaculata ♀
Sympetrum sp.
Sympetrum eroticum ♂
Sympetrum cordulegaster ♀
Pantala flavescens
Um, I have some doubts, of course, is ... the more that a typical Virgo female appeared. :) Typical male Virgo about this: http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=132872 - are you? Photography can distort reality. Yet it seems to me that these two male big bet - at splendens. :)
This species is identified correctly.
IMHO they are colorless, but on the background of green vegetation seems stained. No?
Sympetrum sp., ♂
Probably, although no certainty. Female.
Sympetrum ?eroticum, ♀
Sympetrum cordulegaster, ♀
Calopteryx splendens
Calopteryx splendens
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (26.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
- 13:02, P. Khramov: Bombus → Bombus sylvestris....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Alive and paper butterflies by The American Museum of Natural History
