Insecta.pro Community

31.01.2011 15:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5005

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4977

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4980

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4979

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4984

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4987

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4982

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4996

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4989

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4978

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4970

Arctiidae.

31.01.2011 15:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4995

Limacodidae.

31.01.2011 15:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4994

Limacodidae.

31.01.2011 15:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5001

Only Letis iphianasse can have such purple bleeds, as far as I know. May be not feature though.

31.01.2011 15:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4978

There Evgeny is right, this one is Othorene hodeva male, (Druce, 1904).

31.01.2011 14:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4970

Still, this is Epimolis incarnata male (Hampson, 1901).

31.01.2011 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4971

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 14:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4981

Yes, Vasily is right: Ormetica contraria, Walker, 1854.

31.01.2011 14:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5007

No any more similar than Zatrephes trailii (Butler, 1877).

31.01.2011 14:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5007

Zatrephes trailii (Butler, 1877)???

31.01.2011 14:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4981

Arctiidae 100% sure, Ormetica genus 90% sure.

31.01.2011 14:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4970

Better to get the species description. But only Epimolis incarnata might have a white spot on its abdomen. Albeit, it may just match accidentally, but we've got already the genus what's good anyway.

31.01.2011 13:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5003

Yes, that's it.

31.01.2011 13:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4970

Rather looks like Epimolis incarnata (Hampson, 1901).

31.01.2011 12:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4970

Suggest species, will check it out. www.inra.fr is infected, my computer doesn't let me in.

31.01.2011 12:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4998

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4998

That's it for sure.

31.01.2011 12:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4989

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4996

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4982

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4987

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4980

Yes, sooner.

31.01.2011 12:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4984

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4993

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5001

Black witch Ascalapha odorata has always clearly seen "glasses" at its hind wings. Can't see such there.

31.01.2011 12:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5001

I think, rather Letis iphianasse (Cramer, 1777).

31.01.2011 11:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5001

Something from Letis genus???

31.01.2011 11:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4970

Looks similar to Neonerita marpessa.

31.01.2011 11:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4980

This one is also Paradaemonia???

31.01.2011 1:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4975

Maybe, something of Oxytenis genus???

31.01.2011 1:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5002

If that is butterfly at all???

31.01.2011 1:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4993

My old friend Hyalurga fenestra, (Linnaeus, 1758).

31.01.2011 0:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4977

A. jason female (Boisduval, 1872).

31.01.2011 0:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4979

Seems to be Paradaemonia.

31.01.2011 0:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4980

Dysdaemonia boreas male (Cramer, 1775)????

31.01.2011 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4986

Suggest Hylesia gyrex, Dyar, 1913.

31.01.2011 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4985

Suggest Hylesia gyrex, Dyar, 1913.

31.01.2011 0:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4984

And this one is Therinia buckleyi male (Druce, 1890), Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 0:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4987

Yes, again Evgeny is right!!! Dysdaemonia boreas 100% sure (Cramer, 1775).

31.01.2011 0:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4996

Eacles penelope (Cramer,1775).

Evergestis nomadalis (Lederer, 1871)

Crambidae

Chilo christophi (Bleszynski, 1965)

Crambidae

Ethmia vittalbella (Christoph, 1877)

Elachistidae

Tegostoma baphialis (Staudinger, 1871)

Crambidae

Friedlanderia cicatricella (Hubner, 1824)

Crambidae