Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Chazara enervata.
As for me personally, I also tend to sylvestris, since the antennae are ginger. Just thought you may know few more differences.
Note to the form Ochlodes venata (removed from the base of 09.11.2013 14:26): on all but Photo # 3457 - there Thymelicus sp.
"08-02-2011, Evgeny Karolinsky: This one is Th. sylvestris!" Why not Thymelicus lineola? Though can't see clearly stigma and the antennae, if they're ginger or black. Anyway that is Thymelicus genus 100% sure.
Note to the form Ochlodes venata (removed from the base of 09.11.2013 14:26): Absolutely !!! On all photo Ochlodes sylvanus (Esper, [1778]) have to endure
This one is done, surprisedly and happily.
Let's check out Sphingidae, who is not lazy volunteer?
And this one.
And this one.
And this one, please.
Move this one, please.
Perola villosipes.
Perola villosipes.
Acraga infusa "uncertain".
Acraga infusa "uncertain".
Thus I can identify every thing there....... to the order.
If it's needed to approve already identified successfully ones?
If this is Saturnia (not sure though), then rather Periga genus. Lonomia is what famous of its poisonous caterpillars???
Genus and species added.
May be even Heliconidae. Though there everything is put to Nymphalidae.
That's it: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_imago.htm.
Limacodidae Perola villosipes, (Walker, 1865), female.
Limacodidae Perola villosipes, (Walker, 1865), female.
This species is identified correctly.
Semaeopus subtincta, Warren, 1897.
Agyrta auxo (Linnaeus, 1767), finally.
No!! micilia is rather different.
What a world! All crew is identifying not butterfly but the very author!
And this one is Dysschema tricolor. Approving, please???
Think, Xylophanes titana.
Manduca vestalis???
Hey, I've got it, but what about author???
Found author here: http://www.passions-papillons.com/Arctiidae/arctiidaeguyct.html#auxo.
Yes, looks very similar to! Even red hatted. Author is Linnaeus, 1767, though.
Whoa! Agreed!
Rather Aethria leucaspis (Cramer, 1775). At least, genus is sure.
If I only knew where to find these books...
Who wants and is not lazy, can look through: http://www.flickr.com/photos/33398884@N03/4338530161/in/set-72157623249991359/.
That was not grease! That was aid to Cuba hard-working guys! Whatever, 1€ can't be a grease.
Hey, why that is pulled down, huh??? The more, these two belong to different groups!!! There are two different genera, Morpho helenor (Cramer, 1776) and Morpho achilles (Linnaeus, 1758).
The right one is something of Oleria genus.
Meh, afraid even good connection won't help. Tough case.
Why not Mechanitis or Forbestra genera, or something else of Ithomia??
•Philaethria!!! Added genus and species. Check it!!!!
Genus and species added. By the way, I was nearly arrested in Cuba cause of this one, not because of trying to catch it but crossing some private lands. 1€ saved my soul!
There named as Laparus doris.
There named as Laparus doris.
There named as Laparus doris.
Added.
Genus added.
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (28.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:50, P. Khramov: Confidently identified → Tentativel...
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- ZooKeys latest issue of the Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths
