Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45... 50
Evgeny Karolinsky turned out to identify it even in February.
Male! Look at its androconiae! Seems to me, that's Argynnis ruslana.
Imho, this is pupa of some Psychidae. Suggest Canephora hirsuta (Poda, 1761).
female.
I think you saw Great ash sphinx - Sphinx chersis (Hübner, 1823), or some other from NA Sphinx
This species is identified correctly.
I'll check my Coenonympha at home, maybe find out something.
This is Pyronia tithonus.
Danaus gilippus.
Danaus gilippus.
This species is identified correctly.
This is Danaus plexippus.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Hey, the underside photo? Doubts about Colias phicomone.
Pseudosphinx tetrio. Poisonous for eating or its stings?
Pseudosphinx tetrio.
People from Bahamas go ahead?
Melanargia russiae.
Chazara enervata.
This species is identified correctly.
Cethosia biblis.
Igor! Would you add a photo of its underside?
Where has it been moved? Species is not identified just by external features. As far as I know, these are twin species.
Identified successfully.
True Notodonta ziczac, that's it.
Why did you name it as Colias phicomone???
Such riddles (undetermined photos) we do have 409.
Why not tancrei???
Petr Khramov: Following Roman as for identifying as he evidently knew the species from the very beginning. Roman Romanov: Sure! Looks like... male... So I can consider that like irony about my identifying??? Well, well! If someone is so lazy just to write down the species name and its shot/caught location, ok then, let he keep this info on him. Since today I'll ignore his photos.
And how could it only be "dicolora" when even I can see at least three colors, black, white, orange.
That's what Google says: "No documents found" to Sephisa dicolora request. Can't understand, where from could it only be, Sephisa dicolora princeps Fixs. Why say anything?
Christophi in the Russian Far East??? This is Brahmaea certhia or tancrei.
"Sephisa dicolora princeps Fixs" What for that??? Where did you dig out this combination??? The default reference is Synev Catalogue! Sephisa princeps, male.
If shot in Russia, can't be another species.
Identified wrongly! This is Pieris napi.
News
If you are not Molbiol user, just ignore the message below:
Пользователи Молбиола, перейдите на русскую версию сайта, чтобы прочесть об интеграции Инсекты с энтомологической частью Молбиола и о копировании форума на Инсекту.
- 14.05.2024: Выложен первый полностью функциональный раздел перенесенного форума
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
New photos (16.05.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 14:02, P. Khramov: Выложен первый раздел форума. Для э...
- 13:53, P. Khramov: Выложен первый раздел форума. Для э...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- No Miami blue butterfly on Florida's coasts anymore
