E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41... 50

18.07.2012 10:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13577

Eilema griseolum (Hubner, [1803]) ???

17.07.2012 12:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13780

Olga! The spread underside photo needed. It's male, by the way. Better to have it prepared. Might appear to be something new.

17.07.2012 8:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13780

Arhopala centaurus nakula, male???

04.07.2012 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #7236

What's family?

03.07.2012 16:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #7236

Druceiella amazonensis?

03.07.2012 16:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #11023

Might be perchance Eriocrania semipurpurella (Stephens, 1835). ??

26.06.2012 21:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13437

The underside needed.

25.06.2012 12:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13438

Male.

20.06.2012 23:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13184

Vagrans egista male (Cramer, [1780]).

15.06.2012 12:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13182

This species is identified correctly.

14.06.2012 22:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13139

Xanthorhoe ferrugata maybe??

14.06.2012 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12895

That's not ino.

13.06.2012 9:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #11655

Thanks, I'll check it.

07.06.2012 21:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12956

Possible to look at its upper-side?

06.06.2012 19:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12947

This is Junonia orithya female. Junonia coenia is an American species.

06.06.2012 19:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12948

This is Junonia orithya female.

06.06.2012 18:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13077

It's clear just as it "fell off an ashberry tree".

06.06.2012 18:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12949

Male.

06.06.2012 18:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12949

This species is identified correctly.

06.06.2012 18:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12955

This is Euploea crameri female, a good thing.

06.06.2012 18:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #13077

This is an Aporia crataegi pupa.

30.05.2012 14:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #11848

Why, it actually might be there. You can't say surely without some attributes not seen on photo.

30.05.2012 10:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #11848

25.05.2012, Yury Karpov: I looked right into its eyes. Well, your ophthalmology skills seem to be bad support. You'd rather read something on Neptis.

24.05.2012 22:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #11848

What do you actually mean???

24.05.2012 14:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #11848

How come you identified it as Neptis sappho?

18.05.2012 9:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12706

Papilio polytes ledebouria male.

17.05.2012 15:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12666

Alexandr! I unluckily have no Papilio polytes ledebouria female only male so can't compare. You should've seen its females in Thailand, Papilio polytes romulus subspecies [Cramer, 1775]. As the photo was not signed, I identified it as polytes and even now I'm sure of that it's a polytes female. As for the Papilio alphenor, the article is to be looked up.

16.05.2012 22:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12666

I'll try to clear the situation. Papilio alphenor Cramer, [1776]; is described as a species, http://www.archive.org/stream/deuitlandschekap11779cram#page/n381/mode/1up, then it's noted as a subspecies of Papilio polytes alphenor ; Rothschild, 1895, http://www.archive.org/stream/novitateszoologi02lond#page/351/mode/1up, also there is such a thing like Papilio alphenor ; Vane-Wright & de Jong, ...

16.05.2012 8:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12666

Papilio polytes female.

16.05.2012 8:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12665

This species is identified correctly.

13.05.2012 0:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12650

This is Papilio polytes female, tails already torn off.

05.05.2012 12:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3113

Thanks!

05.05.2012 11:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3113

The exact size really needed. Please, note if it's not hard for you to. No doubt as for the species itself, I just need it for statistics.

05.05.2012 10:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3113

Vasily! Would you please tell its size and, if possible, the label? By e-mail if you'd like.

05.05.2012 9:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12277

Olga! I would kindly ask you to upload more pre-imago stage photos since there are lots of imago stage ones. As to all species.

05.05.2012 9:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #11532

Olga, Vasily, what makes you both feel doubtful? This genus shows marked sexual dimorphism as well as many Pieridae do. This is a female though you can see the male too on the other photo. In Vietnam I came across the mass flight or migration maybe of this species. I could see at that moment hundreds of flying butterflies albeit it was rather hard to catch one.

02.05.2012 18:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12548

Aglia tau female.

02.05.2012 18:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12542

Pararge aegeria.

02.05.2012 0:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12096

If you still own the specimen, I'd advise you to boil it then to make sure since the hind wings confuse. Yet only Euploea mulciber can have such shining forewings.

02.05.2012 0:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Catopsilia pomona

synonyms.

02.05.2012 0:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12386

Skip my turn. Could be lots of.

02.05.2012 0:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12390

This species is identified correctly.

02.05.2012 0:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12390

That was supposed right. No variants.

02.05.2012 0:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12493

Would be cool to see its underside.

02.05.2012 0:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12492

This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2012 13:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4126

Some of those moths fly in the daytime.

25.04.2012 13:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #8024

Gah, there's the rub!

25.04.2012 9:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12277

Pupa photo, if possible?

25.04.2012 8:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #12386

I'll check it once get home.

25.04.2012 8:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #8024

Can't see this photo. After the website's renewing there is some trouble in uploading lots of old photos. Or am I the only one who endures this?

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.