Comments on insects taxa, except for the technical ones
Community and Forum → Comments on insects taxa
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Синоним Phylloecus. Необходимо провести работу на сайту по сведению двух этих таксонов. В качестве источника может быть использовать в т.ч. Review of the genus Phylloecus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Belgium and Western Europe (2020).
Transfer and changes based on: K.V. Makarov, O.L. Kryzhanovsky, I.A. Belousov, A.S. Zamotailov, I.I. Kabak, B.M. Kataev, V.G. Shilenkov, A. V. Matalin, D. N. Fedorenko E. V. Komarov. Systematic list of ground beetles (Carabidae) of Russia. https://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/car_rus.htm 2020.
Transfer source: S.Yu. Sinev & A.L. Lvovsky. Taxonomic status and species composition of the little known genus Agnoea Walsingham, 1907 (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Lypusidae) // Zoosystematica Rossica, 23(1): 137–144. 25 June 2014. [382]
Typo is corrected.
A comment for the sake of order - the species were added by Evgeniy himself.
Replaced.
The species is already on the website as Amauronematus humeralis. As soon as we understand where we are taking Euura squalida, I will transfer photographs if necessary and I'll assign illustrations.
Andrey, I've added Stauronematus platycerus species.
Andrey, I've added F. ewaldi according to David R. Smith, Ewald Altenhofer. The Second Record of a Sawfly Leafminer on Rosa, A New Species of Fenusa (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). April 2011. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 113(1): 57-60. And Fenusa nana (Klug, 1816) - apparently, after all, a synonym for Fenusella nana?
Euura saliciscinereae was added. Is E. squalida a synonym of Euura humeralis (Audinet-Serville, 1823)?
Leave it as it is Conisania (Luteohadena) luteago.
Empria magnicornis: https://insecta.pro/taxonomy/1039135 Priophorus compressicornis: https://insecta.pro/taxonomy/1039136 (Cladius (Priophorus) compressicornis).
The species was added, but synonym remained... I have now deleted the synonym, moved the photo to H. heydeni and put it as an illustration to the species.
A species with a debatable status (L.V. Egorov. About the system of Platyscelidini beetles of the world fauna //Entomol. review. - 2004. - T. LXXXIII (83). - Issue 3. - pp. 581-613, 765-766.
Heterocerus heydeni Kuwert, 1890 is a distinct species - Litovkin SV, Sazhnev AS, Čiampor FJ. Validation of Heterocerus heydeni Kuwert, 1890 based on morphology and DNA barcoding, with notes on the problems of classification of the Heteroceridae (Coleoptera). Zootaxa. 2019 Jun 7;4614(1).
Sphenoptera (Sphenoptera) demissa Marseul, 1866 species need to be added to the website.
Please, add the species: Calyptopsis emarginata Reitter, 1889 - https://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/rus/dbase32.htm
Add a species: Jordanita (Roccia) scintillosa Zolotuhin, 2020 - V.V. Zolotukhin, S.V. Nedoshivina. Variegated lepidoptera (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea) Middle and Lower Volga region. 2020, pp. 70-71.
On GBIF This is Apamea (Apamea) ingloria (A.Bang-Haas, 1912) - https://www.gbif.org/species/1795959 It was also identificated by Alexey Matov.
It is Boloria napaea altaica (Grum-Grshimailo, 1893) now. https://www.gbif.org/species/5882063
Apparently, they taught wrong. The very formulation of the question "why are such and such living organisms needed in nature” is incorrect.
Agriades orbitulus (de Prunner, 1798).
It is Afarsia rutilans (Staudinger, 1886) now
Anthaxia signaticollis Krynicki, 1832 is an independent species! All the images belong to Anthaxia signaticollis speceis.
Chelis thianshanaDubatolov, 1988 is a synonym ofChelis strigulosa (Böttcher, 1905)
Dmitry, tsend me the source of information on the geography of the subspecies, and I will add the geo info.
It is in Driopa subgenus now!
The species is not in this subgenus, but in Kailasius!
Information from the 2016 catalog: The taxa L. marginata and L. opis differ in stable features both in the structure of the genitals of both sexes and in the characteristics of the wing pattern. There is no morphological "transition" between them in Sib. Lomaspilis opis Butler, 1878, stat. resurr., bona sp., is an independent species distributed in Asia. At the subspecific level, we maintain the ...
In the catalog of 2016 it is written: Heydemann described the taxon nigrita in the erroneous status of the subspecies Lomaspilis opis nigrita Heydemann, 1936, not finding obvious structural differences from opis in the genitals and not taking into account the fact of sympatry of opis and nigrita in the Russian DV (in his publication a typical male nigrita from "Ussuri" is illustrated). The ...
Andrey, a big request: submit corrections on the definition of photos at the pages of photos, and not at the pages of the species they illustrate.
Pavel it's nice of you to name the species after me. Thank you)
Photo and description moved to Alcidodes karelinii.
To the request on the page https://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/199154: while I'm creating a taxon of this kind (based on ZIN et al.), there will be a curator of the taxon — if necessary, he will move it.
Andrey, larvae too?
So that the request does not hang empty: the photos have been moved.
Aeshna crenata Hagen, 1856
Ophiogomphus obscurus - Russian name is Змеедедка тёмный.
Very variable species. Not uncommon. Active flying from mid-September to mid-October. It is not active on the nightscreen, but it does not sit under the lamp. Noted: Belgorod region. around S. Boldyrevka,. ur. "Mukhanovo – Shelenkovo", oak forest edge and around Golovino, ur. "Verkina river",
Dear Peter, not a very rare butterfly for the Mukhanovo tract of the Belgorod region. During the active flying period, from 5 to 7 specimen are observed. As for the other places in the Belgorod region, it is not observed. Especially massively flies in late September to mid-October. This information was transmitted to A.Yu. Matov.
In the distribution section, you can specify the Rostov region. Two specimens were caught in a private yard, photos are on display.
The photos were moved to Heterarthrus fasciatus (Andrey has confirmed the species but he didn't send the message to the website).
Cionus tuberculosus (Scopoli, 1763) probably.
What are you talking about, Stanislav? Does your post refer to the page "Polia. serratilinea (Ochsenheimer, 1816)"? two photos on the page are butterflies from the Volgograd region and are identified correctly. Polia lama Staudinger,1896, it is not marked for Europe. There is a third photo from Kyrgyzstan in the gallery of this species. If your post is for this photo, then it is advisable to ...
Move old photos to Pristiphora gerula (Konow, 1904) https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/38338681
https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id70703/
Imago feeds on Elytrigia repens (L.)
And here, too. The family is Scolytidae, and not Curculionidae
Guys, this is a mistake, this is a family Scolytidae, not Curculionidae
It is now called Biselachista utonella (Frey, 1856)
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (26.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
- 13:02, P. Khramov: Bombus → Bombus sylvestris....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Streets: insects names
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Heliconius melpomene genome sequenced: butterflies crossbreed to survive
