E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Proposals for moderating photos.

Community and Forum → Discussions on the website functionality → Proposals for moderating photos.

Shamil Murtazin, 11.12.2013 7:43

Watching another opportunity to improve "working conditions" moderators.
It is - to add functionality: define a single photo of the group - the whole group gets the same attributes.
This will reduce the number of clicks for the "change", as well as reduce the likelihood of errors in affix attributes.Especially when one group of pictures, for various reasons given different attributes (e.g., name determine the accuracy of determination, etc.)

Comments

11.12.2013 7:49, Shamil Murtazin

Just thought it was worth checking to introduce new attributes introduced old. And if they do not match - it displays an error indicating no matched attribute. And you can click "Install anyway".
Optional ...

12.12.2013 19:21, Peter Khramov

Ugums, you can try to do. Tokma mistakes here we still are in groups where one group of people in a completely different foty puts ...

13.12.2013 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yes, I, too, for the automation of the groups regarding the proposed Shamil. If possible, it would be a good idea to implement.

24.12.2013 20:24, Shamil Murtazin

More optimization.
Hiding the button "Submit the form" if the type is defined.
Over hiding when "inaccurate" Definitely worth considering, but I think, too, is to hide - if suddenly there is an error or there is strong evidence - you can always write a comment.

24.12.2013 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov

This button is in my opinion should be removed altogether: clog unnecessary komentami page with the photo. It is always possible to write that kind of defined incorrectly (by providing its own version) and without this key. Atavism IMHO :)

25.12.2013 1:26, Peter Khramov

Basil, click "type defined incorrectly" is long gone.
Shamil, as much as possible to hide the button "Submit the form" for photons, the kind of which is defined? For them it exists - to confirm that the definition is correct.

25.12.2013 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I was referring to the "right type defined" once again. After all, if the type is defined correctly additional komenty this is not absolutely necessary.

25.12.2013 7:59, Shamil Murtazin

Peter, I agree, not thought through to the end. Therefore, the suggested thought.
Simply, there are photos that have already been identified "Reinforced Concrete", in the sense that there are no claims to the moderators opredelitelstvu. City separate flag for that of course is not entirely correct.It may be necessary to reconsider the entire logic of identification and, accordingly, the passage of the attributes of photos this thorny path :)
Partially I agree with Vasily that comment enough.

25.12.2013 22:06, Peter Khramov

Moderators do not have a judge in the last resort, but too much is not exactly. Therefore, the more evidence of determination, the better (more comfortable, intuitive) user. And such acknowledgment not only prevent, but also necessary, including and for species that are "determined exactly."Well, and the fact that from time to time there is a flash mob on fote a thread Peacock day with a series of evidence - do not worry, and even makes a humorous little diversity.

03.01.2014 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I want to make an offer to the poster that you should write the exact species names when uploading photos to the site.
For example: Hypomecis punctinalis is written that way, and not punctialis ; Chloroclystis v-ata is written with a hyphen, and not v ata .Compliance with these rules you will greatly facilitate the work of the moderators so as photos with the misspelled Latin names are automatically placed on the moderation and you have to correct. Over the past couple of days and really I forgot how many times did this. Careful, please.

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.