E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126... 854

29.10.2008 11:20, PG18

Is the dorsal view much more informative? Over there, the antennae are covered with cheek keels on top. A false blackling indeed...

29.10.2008 11:24, Alexandr Rusinov

100% Boros schneideri
Likes: 1

29.10.2008 12:23, omar

Is the dorsal view much more informative?

Much more! But they beat me to it, as always. frown.gif
Likes: 1

29.10.2008 22:10, NakaRB

Moscow and the region. There's not much left already wink.gif

51
[attachmentid()=50944]

52
[attachmentid()=50945]

53
[attachmentid()=50946]

54
[attachmentid()=50947]

55
[attachmentid()=50948]

56 - dark purple, wormwood
[attachmentid ()=50949]

57
[attachmentid()=50950]

58
[attachmentid()=50951]

59
[attachmentid()=50952]

60
[attachmentid()=50953]

This post was edited by NakaRB - 08.11.2008 12: 20

30.10.2008 9:07, Alexandr Rusinov

51 - Strophosomus sp.
52 - Oedemera flavescens
53 - Otiorrhynchus ? tristis
54 - Cantharis sp.
55 - Cantharis sp.
56 - Chrysolina aurichalcea
57 - Thea vigintiduopunctata
58 - Tytthaspis sedecimpunctata
59 - Agriotes obscurus
60 - Denticollis linearis
Likes: 1

30.10.2008 9:54, omar

Strophosomus is still capitatus
Otiorrhynchus ? tristis - он
Likes: 1

30.10.2008 10:22, пигидий

Moscow and the region

Cantharis: nigricans and rustica
Likes: 1

30.10.2008 16:40, Victor Titov

And beetles... Moscow and the region
43
[attachmentid ()=50850]

I can't agree with the opinion of the respected RippeR. Photo 43 does not show Anastrangalia dubia (Scopoli, 1763), but a male Anastrangalia reyi (Heyden, 1889) or Anastrangalia sanguinolenta (Linnaeus, 1761). I'd like to see the pronotum in profile...

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 10/30/2008 16: 42
Likes: 1

30.10.2008 23:17, NakaRB

I can't agree with the opinion of the respected RippeR. Photo 43 does not show Anastrangalia dubia (Scopoli, 1763), but a male Anastrangalia reyi (Heyden, 1889) or Anastrangalia sanguinolenta (Linnaeus, 1761). I'd like to see the pronotum in profile...


alas, what is not there is not there. but thanks for the correction smile.gif

31.10.2008 10:18, Victor Titov

alas, what is not there is not there. but thanks for the correction smile.gif

Still, 90% for Anastrangalia reyi.
Likes: 1

31.10.2008 21:30, Андреас

- Men, - I have a non-holiday question smile.gif- Is this all the same kind of museum kozheed (everything was shot at us on KMV)? "what's his Latin?" confused.gif

31.10.2008 21:35, Fornax13

It's not really a museum (if you mean Anthrenus museorum) of some kind. There are many synanthropes from this genus. You need to look at the sawyere. It reminds me more of A. picturatus or something similar (from the scrophulariae group, in general).
Likes: 1

31.10.2008 23:24, NakaRB

Well, like the last beetles (there will still be weevils separatelywink.gif)... Also Moscow and the region, except for 64-Seliger

61
picture: 7245.jpg

62
picture: 8223.jpg

63-dark red
picture: 8901_2_.jpg

64
picture: 9703.jpg

65
picture: 9935.jpg

This post was edited by NakaRB - 31.10.2008 23: 26

01.11.2008 2:54, RippeR

61 - Molorchus minor
64 - Lepturobosca virens
Likes: 1

01.11.2008 3:04, пигидий

62 Cassida nebulosa
63 Chrysolina staphylaea
65 Ectinus aterrimus, podi
Likes: 1

01.11.2008 9:55, PG18

Please help me with bark beetles. The Middle Urals. The first one is June, the second one is August.

This post was edited by PG18-01.11.2008 09: 59

Pictures:
picture: 433_Ips_0882.jpg
433_Ips_0882.jpg — (138.28к)

picture: 434_DSC_0539.JPG
434_DSC_0539.JPG — (503.05к)

01.11.2008 17:04, Dmitry Vlasov

Second Dryocoetes sp. (M. b. - hectographus)
The first one is more likely Ips, but you need to look at the wheelbarrow from the side, otherwise in this angle it is not clear how many "teeth"there are.
Likes: 1

01.11.2008 18:25, NakaRB

Still scraped together a little smile.gifmore . Moscow and the region

66
picture: 1618.jpg

67
picture: 2056.jpg

68
picture: 3503.jpg

69 (Anastrangalia sanguinolenta?)
picture: 3556.jpg

70 - soft-bodied like, but the angle is only this...
picture: 7696.jpg

71 (Thea vigintiduopunctata?)
picture: 0425.jpg

72
picture: 5639.jpg

73 (Propylea quatuordecimpunctata?)
picture: 1308.jpg

74 (Semiadalia notata?)
picture: 7495.jpg

And the larvae of cows, which can be found out?

75
picture: 1467.jpg

76
picture: 1739.jpg

This post was edited by NakaRB - 01.11.2008 18: 32

01.11.2008 18:29, пигидий

67 Athous subfuscus
70 Rhagonycha fulva
71 yesss
72 Oedemera lurida
Likes: 1

01.11.2008 18:41, RippeR

68-Stictoleptura rubra
69 - rather dubia (or reyi, depending on what is found in MO)
Likes: 1

01.11.2008 19:51, Nikolaj Pichugin

Please help me determine:
Adygea, Maikop
district 29.06.08 leg. Pushkin S. V.
Size 7.5 mm

Pictures:
image: ____. jpg
____.jpg — (103.83к)

picture: DSC00876.JPG
DSC00876.JPG — (89.35к)

01.11.2008 20:52, Андреас

Likes: 1

01.11.2008 20:57, Андреас

- Please identify these bronzes from the CMS:
Sincerely, Andreas.

02.11.2008 6:51, PG18

Second Dryocoetes sp. (M. b. - hectographus)
The first one is more likely Ips, but you need to look at the wheelbarrow from the side, otherwise in this angle it is not clear how many "teeth"there are.

Ips, here:
picture: Ips_0874.jpg
It seems that the teeth are better visible.

And the second one can't be Dryocoetes autographus?

02.11.2008 10:17, Borka

Still scraped together a little smile.gifmore . Moscow and the region


66 Brachyta interrogationis
Likes: 1

02.11.2008 16:45, Victor Titov

- Please identify these bronzes from the CMS:
Sincerely, Andreas.

Photo 1 (couple in love) - Oxythyrea funesta Poda
Photos 2 and 3-in my opinion, Potosia metallica Hbst.
Likes: 1

02.11.2008 16:49, Victor Titov

Still scraped together a little smile.gifmore . Moscow and the region
74 (Semiadalia notata?)

74-yes, Semiadalia notata Laich.
Likes: 1

02.11.2008 16:54, Victor Titov

  
69-rather dubia (or reyi, depending on what is found in MO)

NakaRB, in your photo # 69, of course, the female Anastrangalia reyi (Heyden, 1889), dubia in central Russia has never been and is not. All references in the literature are incorrect definitions reyi.
Likes: 1

02.11.2008 17:55, bugslov

Photo 1 (couple in love) - Oxythyrea funesta Poda
Photos 2 and 3-in my opinion, Potosia metallica Hbst.

3 in my opinion Cetonia aurata L.
Likes: 1

02.11.2008 18:02, Nikolaj Pichugin

3 in my opinion Cetonia aurata L.

Of course Cetonia aurata L.
Likes: 1

02.11.2008 23:49, Victor Titov

Photo 1 (couple in love) - Oxythyrea funesta Poda
Photos 2 and 3-in my opinion, Potosia metallica Hbst.

Dear Nikolay Pichugin and beetleslov, without a doubt, you are right, in photo 3-Cetonia aurata. I apologize for your inattention! redface.gif redface.gif redface.gif That's what haste leads to!
Likes: 2

03.11.2008 14:29, Nilson

Please help me determine:
Adygea, Maikop
district 29.06.08 leg. Pushkin S. V.
Size 7.5 mm

Resembles Leiopus nebulosus
Likes: 1

03.11.2008 16:12, Albatus

- Please identify these bronzes from the CMS:
Sincerely, Andreas.


On photo 2-Potosia cuprina
Likes: 1

03.11.2008 18:14, bugslov

Photo 4 Oxythyrea funesta Poda seems to be
confused.gif
Likes: 1

03.11.2008 19:46, PG18

Second Dryocoetes sp. (M. b. - hectographus)
The first one is more likely Ips, but you need to look at the wheelbarrow from the side, otherwise in this angle it is not clear how many "teeth"there are.

Yes, you're right. The second one turned out to be definitely D. hectographus. The first is most likely I. sexdentatus. (according to M. Y. Mandelstam)

03.11.2008 20:27, Victor Titov

Photo 4 Oxythyrea funesta Poda seems to be
confused.gif

It seems to be yes, only very shabby...
Likes: 2

04.11.2008 10:07, Bad Den

Please tell me about this Batocerini. The label is very detailed-Indonesia, January 2008 shuffle.gif
Body length 81 mm

user posted image

This post was edited by Bad Den-09.04.2018 20: 49

04.11.2008 11:51, Buzman

To Bad Dan: try taking a look here: http://www.coleop-terra.com/batoceraoverview.html
In general, it seems to me that this is B. tigris
Likes: 1

04.11.2008 12:19, Bad Den

To Bad Dan: try taking a look here: http://www.coleop-terra.com/batoceraoverview.html
In general, it seems to me that this is B. tigris

I looked there, my eyes are scattered...
Need to look for tables smile.gif

04.11.2008 14:44, barry

Please help us deal with aphodia...
The versions were prodromus & distinctus.

1. Kharkiv, 11.05.2008.
picture: IMG_3410.JPG

2. Kharkiv, 25.10.2008.

Pages: 1 ...118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.