Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Krasnoyarsk Territory. mowing, forest glade, birch wood.
just over 4 mm. The head tube is slightly curved, the handle reaching up to the anterior edge of the eye. Pronotum, including rounded dissected scales.
Elytra with a large prischitkovym spot and dark spots, 6th row spacing with a dark stripe in the center. At the top, the scales are deeply dissected.
Hypera (s. str.) transsylvanica (Petri, 1901) ?

Probably it, or H. ornata (Capiomont, 1868) since H. postica does not seem to exist in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. All three types are available in the opr. d. V. (there is also a good key for them)

I have Ornata. It's a little different.

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. 23.06.2013.
Really an interventionist? Too similar to Hippodamia convergens. Or is it Hippodamia variegata?

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. 23.06.2013.
Really an interventionist? Too similar to Hippodamia convergens. Or is it Hippodamia variegata?

variegata

As many as I could determine, the rest all died. Help with the definition
of 1. 11 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.11.07.14. N-550m.

2. 9 mm. KCR.p. Khumara under the stone 5.4.14. N-900m

3. 11 mm. KCR.p. Khumara under the stone 5.4.14.

4. 7 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 25.3 14 N-495 m.

5. 8 mm. CR.SAO N - 1785m Observatory. in traps 5.6. -19.7.14.

6.14 mm. KCR Bukovo. In traps 5.6. -19.7.14 deciduous forest

7. 9 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.03.04.14. N-550m

8.12 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol deciduous forest. sifting of litter 03.07.14. N-550 m.

9.10 mm. KCR Bukovo. In traps 5.6. -19.7.14 deciduous forest

10.10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.4.07.14. N-495m

11.10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol deciduous forest. sifting of litter 03.07.14. N-550 m.

12 6mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.11.07.14. N-495m

13.9 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.

14. 8.5 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.

15. 11 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.25.3.14. N-495m

16. 8 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.07.4.14. N-495m

17. 10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.

18 10 mm.KCR Teberda ur.Jamagat field with boulders under the stone 3.8.14.

19.8, 5 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.4.07.14. N-550m

20. 7.5 mm. KCR Bukovo. In traps 5.6. -19.7.14 deciduous forest

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 22.
Like Phyllobius? Phyllobius pomaceus?

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 22.
Like Phyllobius? Phyllobius pomaceus?

Phyllobius (Metaphyllobius) glaucus (Scopoli, 1763)

As many as I could determine, the rest all died. Help with the definition

It's a very thankless task to determine this from pictures. Only Harpalus caspius (#3 - male, 17-female) is easily recognized. The rest - in the form of ideas, I hope you will find useful:
1. 11 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.11.07.14. N-550m.
Harpalus rubripes fem.

2. 9 mm. KCR.p. Humara under the stone 5.4.14. N-900m
Harpalus female. (tardus ?)

3. 11 mm.KCR. p. Khumara under the stone 5.4.14.
H. caspius

4. 7 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 25.3 14 N-495 m
. Amara is similar in outline, strongly bicolored mustache and size to the simple aenea.

5. 8 mm. CR.SAO N - 1785m Observatory. in traps 5.6. -19.7.14.
It seems similar to Olisthopus. But you need to at least look at the claws, suddenly it's Synuchus like this

6.14 mm. KCR Bukovo. In traps 5.6. -19.7.14 deciduous forest
of Pterostichus. It resembles P. (Eurymelanius) caucasicus.

7. 9 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.03.04.14. Н-550м
Harpalus distinguendus

8.12 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol deciduous forest. sifting of litter 03.07.14. N-550 m.
Calathus sp.

9.10 mm. KCR Bukovo. in traps 5.6. -19.7.14 Deciduous forest
Pterostichus of Bothriopterus

10.10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.4.07.14. Н-495м
Pterostichus sp. some kind of anthracinous appearance..

11.10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol deciduous forest. sifting of litter 03.07.14. N-550 m.
Harpalus fem.

12 6mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.11.07.14. Н-495м
Harpalus sp. cute, small, but incomprehensible

13.9 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.
Harpalus sp. similar to tardus, cheslovo. You can take a look at small Haploharpalus (froelichi, brevis)

14. 8.5 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.
male from the previous (?)

15. 11 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.25.3.14. H-495m
female distinguendus

16. 8 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.07.4.14. H-495m
Ophonus sp. - very difficult beetles

17. 10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.
female caspius

18 10 mm.KCR Teberda ur.Jamagat field with boulders under the stone 3.8.14.
Ophonus (judging by the density of the dotted line of the back and head, there is no pubescence)

19.8, 5 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.4.07.14. H-550m
Agonum sp.

20. 7.5 mm. KCR Bukovo. in traps 5.6. -19.7.14 Pterostichus deciduous forest


This post was edited by smax - 12/16/2014 16: 20

It's a very thankless task to determine this from pictures. Only Harpalus caspius (#3 - male, 17-female) is easily recognized. The rest - in the form of ideas, I hope you will find useful:
1. 11 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.11.07.14. N-550m.
Harpalus rubripes fem.

2. 9 mm. KCR.p. Humara under the stone 5.4.14. N-900m
Harpalus female. (tardus ?)

3. 11 mm.KCR. p. Khumara under the stone 5.4.14.
H. caspius

4. 7 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 25.3 14 N-495 m
. Amara is similar in outline, strongly bicolored mustache and size to the simple aenea.

5. 8 mm. CR.SAO N - 1785m Observatory. in traps 5.6. -19.7.14.
It seems similar to Olisthopus. But you need to at least look at the claws, suddenly it's Synuchus like this

6.14 mm. KCR Bukovo. In traps 5.6. -19.7.14 deciduous forest
of Pterostichus. It resembles P. (Eurymelanius) caucasicus.

7. 9 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.03.04.14. Н-550м
Harpalus distinguendus

8.12 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol deciduous forest. sifting of litter 03.07.14. N-550 m.
Calathus sp.

9.10 mm. KCR Bukovo. in traps 5.6. -19.7.14 Deciduous forest
Pterostichus of Bothriopterus

10.10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.4.07.14. Н-495м
Pterostichus sp. some kind of anthracinous appearance..

11.10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol deciduous forest. sifting of litter 03.07.14. N-550 m.
Harpalus fem.

12 6mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.11.07.14. Н-495м
Harpalus sp. cute, small, but incomprehensible

13.9 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.
Harpalus sp. similar to tardus, cheslovo. You can take a look at small Haploharpalus (froelichi, brevis)

14. 8.5 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.
male from the previous (?)

15. 11 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.25.3.14. H-495m
female distinguendus

16. 8 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.07.4.14. H-495m
Ophonus sp. - very difficult beetles

17. 10 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol Mowing on grass 28.6 14 N-550m.
female caspius

18 10 mm.KCR Teberda ur.Jamagat field with boulders under the stone 3.8.14.
Ophonus (judging by the density of the dotted line of the back and head, there is no pubescence)

19.8, 5 mm.Surrounding area. Stavropol under the stone.4.07.14. H-550m
Agonum sp.

20. 7.5 mm. KCR Bukovo. in traps 5.6. -19.7.14 Pterostichus deciduous forest

Thank you I'm so grateful. And then all the brains broke

Germany
06.09.2014
3mm
Scymnus frontalis ?

Pictures:

CM141217_19252308.jpg — (291.74к)

Is it possible to determine the seed?
Aspidapion radiolus?
04.08.2014
MO, Mytischenskiy district, Manyukhino village
on malva
[attachmentid ()=213926]
[attachmentid()=213927]

Size 6 mm. from leaf beetles, I assume the genus Cryptocephalus...help with the name)

Pictures:

___024243_3157.JPG — (128.6к)

size 4.5 mm

Pictures:

___024243_3127.JPG — (98.39к)

size 5 mm

Pictures:

___024243_3128.JPG — (91.58к)

Size 6 mm. from leaf beetles, I assume the genus Cryptocephalus...help with the name)

This is NOT Cryptocephalus, but one of the real leaf eaters-Chrysomelinae

size 4.5 mm

? Gastroidea viridula

size 5 mm

? Phratora sp.

size 4.5 mm. elytra green with meth. glitter, head blue

Pictures:

___024243_3129.JPG — (95.28к)

size 4.5 mm. elytra green with meth. glitter, head blue

? Gastroidea viridula color variant

about 1-1. 2 mm. Mecinus ?
the head tube is long and curved, the pronotum is transverse in short pressed hairs, rounded scales on the sides. The elytra and legs are red-brown, some dark brown. On the aisles raised wider hairs in one row, in the rows of hairs are thinner. The mace is dark, the first parts of the mustache are light. 5 members Claws without denticles, close at the base.

about 1-1. 2 mm. Mecinus ?
the head tube is long and curved, the pronotum is transverse in short pressed hairs, rounded scales on the sides. The elytra and legs are red-brown, some dark brown. On the aisles raised wider hairs in one row, in the rows of hairs are thinner. The mace is dark, the first parts of the mustache are light. 5 members Claws without denticles, close at the base.

Mecinus plantaginis Eppelsheim, 1875

Please help me make out the bronze medal from Croatia

Pictures:

1.jpg — (293.25к)


1.1.jpg — (308.45к)


2.jpg — (284.24 k)


2.1.jpg — (297.93к)


3.jpg — (317.3к)


3.1.jpg — (320k)


4.jpg — (269.71к)


4.1.jpg — (327.86к)

another one...

Pictures:

5.jpg — (274.11 k)


5.1.jpg — (277.11к)

Please help me make out the bronze medal from Croatia

probably so: the first bronze is Protaetia angustata, all the others are Cetonia aurata

about 5 mm. Possibly a young, under-colored specimen. I would call it viciae, but I am confused by the strongly split setae on the elytra.

about 5 mm. Possibly a young, under-colored specimen. I would call it viciae, but I am confused by the strongly split setae on the elytra.

yes, clearly under-developed copy.
I'm confused by something resembling a prishchitkovoe spot, which is not present in viciae
maybe it's transsylvanica like this?

Ground beetle - ???
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Hripani neighborhood, 20.06.2014

Pictures:

2014.06.20__DSC02100.jpg — (344.55к)

Ground beetle - ???
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Hripani neighborhood, 20.06.2014

Poecilus ?cupreus/versicolor.

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 12/21/2014 17: 53

Is this Tychius meliloti?
front tibia with teeth. At the base of the pronotum and at the suture of the elytra, the scales are more rounded.

Is this Tychius meliloti?
front tibia with teeth. At the base of the pronotum and at the suture of the elytra, the scales are more rounded.

yes, male Meliloti, classic

Micro-barbels from the Dominican Republic.
Body length 4 mm.

I assume that they are from the same genus close to our Exocentrus

Pictures:

Dom_8_crmb.jpg — (182.37 k)


Dom_9_crmb.jpg — (289.36к)

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 22.
Anastrangalia reyi?

Micro-barbels from the Dominican Republic.
Body length 4 mm.

I assume that they are from the same genus close to our Exocentrus

In my opinion, it is of the same type. These are Urgleptes of the type Urgleptes sandersoni Gilmour 1963.

https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/...sp?id=11983&w=n

They probably aren't even very close to Leiopus, let alone exocentrus.. Neotropics, of course.

In my opinion, it is of the same type. These are Urgleptes of the type Urgleptes sandersoni Gilmour 1963.

https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/...sp?id=11983&w=n

They probably aren't even very close to Leiopus, let alone exocentrus.. Neotropics, of course.

Thank you, Maxim! I have about such (only the drawing is different for everyone) 10 more pieces. Maybe all of them are of the same type?

And they are half different, right?

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 22.
Anastrangalia reyi?

Like, yes. Not sanguinolenta

And they're half different, right?

definitely A Joke. With a bit of a joke, as always. Danilevsky said " the length of the antennas does not matter." Right. It is necessary to open them, for clarity. Or, at least, see postpigidium. Because even our species deceive mercilessly, both at the level of individuals and species.
There is an incomprehensible amulet on a needle with intact and not ugly antennae slightly longer than half the body... You never know

This post was edited by smax - 12/22/2014 22: 30

definitely

yes it's me after the weevils in other beetles I can't even determine the gender normally

Sometimes I'll shoot some small stuff, and then I'll remember that Paul didn't watch it. Well, so I leave it, without specifying. Sometimes, you can't look at a one-and-a-half-millimeter "box" after opening without tears, let alone taking pictures.

Size 5 mm. Which of the leaf eaters?

Pictures:

___024243_3125.JPG — (137.35к)