E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686... 854

25.08.2016 5:05, akulich-sibiria

The first photos of bark beetles - Ips sexdentatus and the breed corresponds.

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 25.08.2016 05: 05
Likes: 2

25.08.2016 7:21, OEV

M. O., Lishnyagi, 21.08.2016


2. Harmonia quadripunctata (Pontoppidan, 1763)
4. yes.gif
Likes: 2

25.08.2016 8:26, Radik

Please tell me if this is Coptocephala quadrimaculata or C. unifasciata.
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district of Blagodatnaya district. July 4, 2016.

25.08.2016 9:42, Mantispid

Please tell me if this is Coptocephala quadrimaculata or C. unifasciata.
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district of Blagodatnaya district. July 4, 2016.

C. unifasciata is more likely than C. gebleri Gebler, 1841 (=quadrimaculata F.)
But to determine, you need to see how the forehead is dotted and the mandibles are arranged. The color of their platbands is quite variable.

25.08.2016 9:47, Dmitry Vlasov

Elizar, in the first photo (2.jpg), laid out by me, from left to right-forest dung, golden bronze, the next beetle I doubt (I think it's a dung beetle, but still not), then-ordinary platysma.

1.Anoplotrupes stercorosus (Scriba, 1791)
2.Cetonia aurata (Linnaeus, 1758).
3.Anoplotrupes stercorosus (Scriba, 1791)
4. Pterostichus niger (Schaller, 1783).

25.08.2016 9:52, Dmitry Vlasov

In the second photo (3.jpg) continues a series of platysmas, then 4 leptures of red. I don't know anyone on the second row, except for aspen leaf beetle (7 on the left), then through one that I don't know, there are Colorado potato beetles at the end of the row of its larvae.

1-4. Pterostichus niger (Schaller, 1783).
5-6. Stictoleptura rubra
7-8. Oedemeridae
row 2
1. Poecilus sp.
2.? is hard to see...
3/ Harpalus sp.
4. Ampedus sp.
5. Amara sp.
6,8. Oxythyrea funesta (Poda, 1761).
7. Chrysomela populi

This post was edited by Elizar - 25.08.2016 09: 54

25.08.2016 9:58, Dmitry Vlasov

In another photo (4.jpg I don't know anyone behind the sculptures.

1-2. Stictoleptura rubra
3-4. Oedemeridae
5-6. Harpalus (Pseudophonus) rufipes
7-8. Tenebrio molitor
9. Prosternon tesselatum
10. Harpalus sp.
Go ahead yourself!!! The charity session is over, the caller ID is here to help!

25.08.2016 10:09, Dmitry Vlasov

C. unifasciata is more likely than C. gebleri Gebler, 1841 (=quadrimaculata F.)
But to determine, you need to see how the forehead is dotted and the mandibles are arranged. The color of their platbands is quite variable.

Here it is not clear which Coptocephala quadrimaculata comrade meant - if Coptocephala quadrimaculata (Linnaeus, 1767), then it is now Coptocephala linnaeana Petitpierre and Alonso-Zarazaga, 2000, and earlier it was considered a synonym of unifasciata (Scopoli, 1763). A quadrimaculata F. there is no such taxon/synonym in the palearctic catalog at all...

25.08.2016 10:57, Mantispid

Here it is not clear which Coptocephala quadrimaculata comrade meant - if Coptocephala quadrimaculata (Linnaeus, 1767), then it is now Coptocephala linnaeana Petitpierre and Alonso-Zarazaga, 2000, and earlier it was considered a synonym of unifasciata (Scopoli, 1763). A quadrimaculata F. there is no such taxon/synonym in the palearctic catalog at all...

Yes, I understand, there is a confusing situation with "quadrimaculata"... and linnaeana is still not found in Russia, so I decided that it means gebleri

This post was edited by Mantispid - 08/25/2016 10: 57

25.08.2016 11:23, Dmitry Vlasov

Yes, I understand, there is a confusing situation with "quadrimaculata"... and linnaeana is still not found in Russia, so I decided that it means gebleri

Most likely, Radik was referring to the same type, which in different manuals goes by different names (former synonyms). Like C. gebleri in Tatarstan no

25.08.2016 11:47, Mantispid

Most likely, Radik was referring to the same type, which in different manuals goes by different names (former synonyms). There is no such thing as C. gebleri in Tatarstan

Indeed, it probably does not reach Tatarstan. Isaev first specified for Tatarstan, but then (in the determinant) it is written that the indication is probably erroneous.

In the Saratov region, there are both types.

25.08.2016 14:02, Necrocephalus

C. gebleri are usually larger and slightly different proportions. and it's not her.

25.08.2016 14:22, Jaguar paw

A weevil for identification (if it can be identified from such a photo). Georgia, Shatili, 22.08.2016

Pictures:
picture: 123.jpg
123.jpg — (533.38 k)

25.08.2016 15:59, Mantispid

A weevil for identification (if it can be identified from such a photo). Georgia, Shatili, 22.08.2016

Larinus sp.
Likes: 1

25.08.2016 16:35, Jaguar paw

Thank you, Ilya. Also went to this genus, but failed to get to the species, it seems from this photo and will not work.

25.08.2016 17:01, Koala04

1-2. Stictoleptura rubra
3-4. Oedemeridae
5-6. Harpalus (Pseudophonus) rufipes
7-8. Tenebrio molitor
9. Prosternon tesselatum
10. Harpalus sp.
Go ahead yourself!!! The charity session is over, the caller ID is here to help!

Thanks for that, too.

25.08.2016 18:34, Витаминыч

Thank you, Ilya. Also went to this genus, but failed to get to the species, it seems from this photo and will not work.

The maximum that can be squeezed out of this photo is the subgenus Larinus s. str.

25.08.2016 21:38, Mantispid

The maximum that can be extracted from this photo is the subgenus Larinus s. str.

rather, Larinus (Phyllonomeus), in s. str. I do not recall species with such a long gtrb., and there is no saddle-shaped indentation, although some keels seem to be viewed

26.08.2016 4:02, Satyr

China, prov. Liaoning, Liaodong Peninsula, Dalian City, Liushunkou District (Port Arthur)
beginning of August 2016
What is this snake-like barbel?

Pictures:
picture: P8220227.JPG
P8220227.JPG — (282.21к)

26.08.2016 7:40, Radik

Most likely, Radik was referring to the same type, which in different manuals goes by different names (former synonyms). There is no such thing as C. gebleri in Tatarstan

Here - V. F. Khabibullin, O. S. Muravitsky " Atlas-determinant of coccinellids (ladybirds)(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Bashkortostan. Ufa. RIC BASHGU. 2011 - listed Coptocephala (s.str.) quadrimaculata (Linnaeus, 1767). But now the view is called differently?

26.08.2016 9:22, Radik

Tell me pozh-ta is Larinus turbinatus? Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district

26.08.2016 9:33, Dmitry Vlasov

Here - V. F. Khabibullin, O. S. Muravitsky " Atlas-determinant of coccinellids (ladybirds)(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Bashkortostan. Ufa. RIC BASHGU. 2011 - listed Coptocephala (s.str.) quadrimaculata (Linnaeus, 1767). But now the view is called differently?

Your species is Coptocephala unifasciata (Scopoli, 1763) .

26.08.2016 9:37, Radik

Your species is Coptocephala unifasciata (Scopoli, 1763).

Thanks for the clarification.

26.08.2016 15:12, Fornax13

China, prov. Liaoning, Liaodong Peninsula, Dalian City, Liushunkou District (Port Arthur)
beginning of August 2016
What is this snake-like barbel?

take a look at the item Aromia bungii

26.08.2016 15:13, Fornax13

Tell me pozh-ta is Larinus turbinatus? Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district

L. vulpes

27.08.2016 12:05, gstalker

Help me identify a cow
2.5 mm 20.05.16 Germany
Scymnus frontalis confused.gif
Nephus quadrimaculatus confused.gif
Platynaspis luteorubra confused.gif

Pictures:
picture: 2016_08_24_12_49_18_M_C_R_50_S_10.jpg
2016_08_24_12_49_18_M_C_R_50_S_10.jpg — (62.97к)

27.08.2016 15:27, OEV

Help me identify a cow
2.5 mm 20.05.16 Germany
Scymnus frontalis confused.gif
Nephus quadrimaculatus confused.gif
Platynaspis luteorubra confused.gif


Scymnus frontalis yes.gif
Likes: 1

27.08.2016 16:30, IchMan

I wouldn't be so peremptory as to say umnik.gif
Rather, it is Uloma rufa, the base of the pronotum is not bordered in the middle, and the indentation in the male U. culinaris is much more pronounced...

I'm certainly not a coleopterist, and I'm certainly not an expert on blackbirds, but I've had to deal with a lot of coleopteran groups in my line of work. According to Silferberg (2010), U. culinaris is not found in Karelia, I can only compare it from images, but U. rufa is familiar to me, and I have never marked it on deciduous trees. In the pictures, the border at the base of the pronotum in the middle is not quite clear, but still, in my opinion, it is not interrupted.
It seems that Karelia now also has U. culinaris...

This post was edited by IchMan - 08/27/2016 16: 44

27.08.2016 17:13, Dmitry Vlasov

I'm certainly not a coleopterist, and I'm certainly not an expert on blackbirds, but I've had to deal with a lot of coleopteran groups in my line of work. According to Silferberg (2010), U. culinaris is not found in Karelia, I can only compare it from images, but U. rufa is familiar to me, and I have never marked it on deciduous trees. In the pictures, the border at the base of the pronotum in the middle is not quite clear, but still, in my opinion, it is not interrupted.
It seems that Karelia now also has U. culinaris...

Dear IchMan - in YAO, where I come yes.giffrom, there are both species, and I, as a person interested in xylobionts, understand a little about these black bodies. Indeed, U. rufa prefers "needles", especially dead pines, BUT there have been finds tested on beetles and from birches. Therefore, to determine only by breed - there is no Comme il fautshuffle.gif, especially from the photo, the signs are "read" well.
With respect... beer.gif

This post was edited by Elizar - 27.08.2016 17: 13

27.08.2016 23:58, IchMan

Dear IchMan - in YAO, where I come yes.giffrom, there are both species, and I, as a person interested in xylobionts, understand a little about these black bodies. Indeed, U. rufa prefers "needles", especially dead pines, BUT there have been finds tested on beetles and from birches. Therefore, to determine only by breed - there is no Comme il fautshuffle.gif, especially from the photo, the signs "read" well.
With respect... beer.gif

Naturally, I didn't just look at the breed. Nikitsky et al. (1996) showed that both these species can be found on both deciduous and coniferous trees. It's just that, apparently, as I mentioned earlier, Karelia also has both species (it's only now clear) smile.gif
In Karelia before, and in Finland before 2010, only rufa was indicated, which confused me somewhat (I kept all Karelians for this type)...
beer.gif

29.08.2016 0:25, Slavinator

Help me name the beetles. Saratov region.

Pictures:
picture: ____1.JPG
____1.JPG — (295.47к)

picture: ____12.JPG
____12.JPG — (285.24 k)

picture: ____13.JPG
____13.JPG — (284.7к)

29.08.2016 22:24, Slavinator

Staphylinid if you can be more specific!

29.08.2016 22:58, Slavinator

The last Sorrel leaf eater?

29.08.2016 23:58, Victor Titov

The last Sorrel leaf eater?

No, Alticinae leaf beetle.

30.08.2016 8:57, олег алексеевич

help identify ground beetles 4257,4255,4253 (krasotel Maksimovich???) and 4249.4218 (maclay?????) South Sakhalin. July.

This post was edited by oleg alekseevich - 30.08.2016 09: 01

Pictures:
picture: RSCN4257.JPG
RSCN4257.JPG — (456.24к)

picture: RSCN4255.JPG
RSCN4255.JPG — (290.16к)

picture: RSCN4253.JPG
RSCN4253.JPG — (442.54к)

picture: RSCN4249.JPG
RSCN4249.JPG — (415.4к)

picture: RSCN4218.JPG
RSCN4218.JPG — (386.82к)

30.08.2016 19:48, stierlyz

31.08.2016 19:48, Dorcadion

Friends! Help me identify the beetles collected in Georgia, in the Ambrolauri region, as I understand it is some kind of langriid?

Pictures:
picture: IMG_5344.JPG
IMG_5344.JPG — (292.92к)

picture: IMG_5347.JPG
IMG_5347.JPG — (286.19к)

01.09.2016 13:53, Barnaba

And who is "langriida"? If it is furry (Lagriidae), then it is not. And not Languriidae (lizard beetles). According to its general habit, it is an abscess (Meloidae), of the type Lytta-Teratolytta. But I don't really see the signs. If it were possible to cut out the beetle itself from the source code and show it with a higher resolution, at least the whiskers and paws, it would be possible to say more precisely. Or shoot the collected material. The larvae are leaf beetles, but I don't know which ones.

01.09.2016 14:26, Dmitry Vlasov

And who is "langriida"? If it is furry (Lagriidae), then it is not. And not Languriidae (lizard beetles). According to its general habit, it is an abscess (Meloidae), of the type Lytta-Teratolytta. But I don't really see the signs. If it were possible to cut out the beetle itself from the source code and show it with a higher resolution, at least the whiskers and paws, it would be possible to say more precisely. Or shoot the collected material. The larvae are leaf beetles, but I don't know which ones.

For me, this is some kind of narrow wing (sem. Oedemeridae)... Judging by the size of leaf beetle larvae, the beetle is small-no more than 10 mm

01.09.2016 14:59, Andrey Ponomarev

I picked up Eupithecia denotata caterpillars in Lichens whose caterpillars develop on the bell, and at home I found a passenger.
M. O., Lichens 21.08.2016. on the bell (possibly on Campanula trachelium)

picture: IMG_3815________________.jpg
picture: IMG_3820________________.jpg
picture: IMG_3854________________.jpg
picture: IMG_3855________________.jpg

Pages: 1 ...678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.