Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102... 854

12.07.2008 17:31, Necrocephalus

it may be Lathrobium pallidum Nordm.

It seems to have hit the nail on the head!

Although, of course, doubts still remain.
Fornax 13, thanks again for the list of abbreviations, everything has become MUCH easier with it!

I ran the beetle through the determinant, starting with the table of Lathrobium subgenera. Came out on the nominative, as suggested by amara. Further, according to all the listed characteristics, this is L. pallidum Nordm.

Just not the fact that it will be determined. It is necessary to pull the genitals in any case.

I'm not sure either. That you've made up your mind. In general, with staphylinids I always do, especially with small ones... I don't have much experience yet

I probably won't pull the genitals yet. Moreover, there are no drawings for comparison.
Anyway, thank you all!

This post was edited by Necrocephalus - 12.07.2008 17: 33

14.07.2008 11:37, Трофим

On the definition of black heifers and one barbel
Black heifers:
S7307559-1) Ukraine Nikolsky region Bugskoye village VII 2002 2) also from there
S7307560-1) Moldova Kozhushna 03.05.2005 2) Moldova Vatra V 2002
S7307561 Moldova Ketrosy (house on earth) 09.04.2005
If about 560 I think gnaptor spinimanus. Then about 559-there is a suspicion that something else. 561 –blaps ?

Usach Moldova Hincesti district Sarata-Meresheny 20.05.08 (mowing grass on a forest path). Leoderus colari, here the sole of the paw segment is hairy. Or is it still ♀ Phymatodes testaceus?

Pictures:
picture: S7307559.JPG

S7307559.JPG — (125.59к)

picture: S7307560.JPG

S7307560.JPG — (120.57к)

picture: S7307561.JPG

S7307561.JPG — (100.45к)

picture: S7307563.JPG

S7307563.JPG — (117.16к)

picture: S7307565.JPG

S7307565.JPG — (114.67к)

Likes: 1

Likes: 6

Likes: 1

Likes: 3

Likes: 2

Likes: 1

17.07.2008 9:42, Aleksandr Safronov

Yes, the problem is that this species is not known from the Moscow region. It could be a very good find.

For the Tula region, the type was also not recorded and it is still not included in the lists. Beetles (2 females) were caught, as I have already reported, at the DRL lamp in 2002. I verbally reported information about the find to Bolshakov L. V., who published a printed version of the annotated list of barbels of the Tula region (1999). The problem is that the specimens could have been imported with the material, and there are no populations. I never saw this view again in the area. If anyone needs information about the point-Tula region, Kireevsky district, Bolokhovo (20 km South of Tula), on the wall of the building at the DRL lamp, 28.07.2002.

This post was edited by Entalex - 07/18/2008 07: 58

Likes: 4

Likes: 2