E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Total drawing

Community and ForumOther questions. Insects topicsTotal drawing

Pages: 1 2

13.02.2007 12:22, KDG

Duc, no one disputes that photos are good (and good photos are even better!). I would generally single out total drawing, photography and scanography in separate types of art and everyone is free to choose what is more convenient and pleasant for him. K. Makarov is a great photographer, but he draws no worse. At the same time, looking at the drawings of K. Dovgailo, you always think that the existing digital technology has not yet grown to such a level.
So, dear KDG, if suddenly, our native polygraphy will not be able to convey all the nuances of photos that you need, and my modest abilities will suit you, please contact us. We'll make a deal!
smile.gif

I do not consider the facets of art at all (even if someone likes to sculpt from plasticinesmile.gif), I am interested in a purely applied aspect.
And otechestvennaya printing and drawing can kill. And by the way, I don't like the bourgeois print in the Magellan Notebooks series either. But in fact-the main (for me) problem in printing is the lack of free or inexpensive color. B / w photo magazines take without objections, and for the color obyno want money and usually considerable. This is certainly their right, especially if the print is excellent, but you can't stick 50-100 color photos out of your pocket...
Thank you for the suggestion.

13.02.2007 12:42, Dinusik

I do not consider the facets of art at all (even if someone likes to sculpt from plasticinesmile.gif), I am interested in a purely applied aspect.
And otechestvennaya printing and drawing can kill. And by the way, I don't like the bourgeois print in the Magellan Notebooks series either. But in fact-the main (for me) problem in printing is the lack of free or inexpensive color. B / w photo magazines take without objections, and for the color obyno want money and usually considerable. This is certainly their right, especially if the print is excellent, but you can't stick 50-100 color photos out of your pocket...
Thank you for the suggestion.


Dear Denis (if I figured you out correctly)!
And can I, as a novice photographer and entomologist, ask you for help in identifying one barbel I photographed? I'm not a mustache specialist.

13.02.2007 13:08, KDG

Dear Denis (if I figured you out correctly)!
And can I, as a novice photographer and entomologist, ask you for help in identifying one barbel I photographed? I don't know much about sawyers.

send Dean over and we'll see.

This post was edited by KDG-02/13/2007 13: 09

13.02.2007 13:25, Dinusik

send Dean over and we'll see.


Thanks! I'll send it to your email address, but I can't insert a picture here. smile.gif

13.02.2007 14:17, Mikhail F. Bagaturov

If you don't mind, Dina, just for the sake of curiosity smile.gif
to: mikepride@centrum.cz

13.02.2007 17:50, RippeR

And I'm welcome! riprulez@mail.ru

About the photo. Our institute bought a photo camera, in my opinion at 5 mp. With a microscope, it is very convenient to take pictures! Later I will bring some photos taken through a microscope. And here is a photo taken using a 1.3 mp mobile phone. Of course, the photo is not very good, but this is due to the 4x magnification, when the quality of the photo drops significantly (just because of the personal qualities of a mobile phone with 1xfold, it turns out too small and far, but when working with the camera, it turns out perfectly!). I have already posted some photos - those were taken simply with a camera, without magnification.
Such a camera costs about 200-something bucks.
Well, those who like to draw should continue to draw. smile.gif

Pictures:
 the image is no longer on the site: Cucujus_070129_171509.jpg Cucujus_070129_171509.jpg — (28.46к) 13.02.2007 — 27.02.2007

13.02.2007 22:28, Shofffer

Such a camera costs about 200-something bucks.

The model?

13.02.2007 22:54, Necrocephalus


according to many drawings from Jacobson, and from Reitter, beetles are not only difficult to determine, but impossible. So, by the way... The determinant and other scientific works should primarily meet their direct tasks.

I absolutely agree. I haven't seen any drawings from Reitter, but in the Jacobson Determinant, this is exactly the case.

13.02.2007 23:00, Necrocephalus

I specifically referred to the author of the drawings in Jacobson. And it is not clear who can not be identified there?

omar, look at the ground beetles. Especially large genera. Will you insist that these drawings will help you identify better than photos?
Likes: 1

14.02.2007 0:27, RippeR

"The model? "
And figs knows smile.gifit, I can ask if you're interested.

Pages: 1 2

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.