In the course of discussing the status of the genus Protesilaus and beyond.

Community and Forum → Taxonomy. Classification → In the course of discussing the status of the genus Protesilaus and beyond.

Evgeny Komarov, 20.02.2011 18:43

Start the discussion on the page and type Protesilaus protesilaus since it has grown, it has decided to continue here. And shifting the first post in a single "bunch " for clarity.
20-02-2011 Dmitry Pozhogin: remove this family
02.20.2011, Evgeny Komarov: Dmitry, and what is it?
20-02-2011 Dmitry Pozhogin: Eurytides, Protesilaus, Mimoides will integrate better into the genus Eurytides
02.20.2011, Evgeny Komarov: Reason? While in http://swallowtails.net/ and http://www.nhm.ac.uk / research-curation / research / projects / butmoth / this kind of independent figures. There is something more sane?
20-02-2011 Dmitry Pozhogin: I like http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com Opler & Warren, 2003 Butterflies of North America. Scott, James A.1986; The Butterflies of North America

Dmitri might be so, but at this site, and sources have cited unlike me that they did not represent the group on the scale of the world's fauna, as well as, as I understand it, the reduction of births alone, and there is recognized.Actually, I do not mind - I am afraid "blurring " structure of major and widespread families into pieces. Ie, to take one part of the European vision for another North American, etc. Let's discuss!