E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Changing of the image status

Community and Forum → Questions about image uploading and editing on the website → Changing of the image status

Yuri Semejkin, 29.05.2012 2:30

Petr, hello! I've got some questions to ask. There are three images held at my personal account for already lots of time somehow not been moved yet, can't understand why not.
Also: certain already moved images are still named as "undetermined" though some of them are actually identified by experts from Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS, such as E. Belyaev and M. Ponomarenko.
Petr, I recall also you said some time ago that some Far Eastern species would be moved in at least 2—3 weeks. They've successfully passed and nothing changed...
... or something goes wrong?
All the best,
Yura

Comments

30.05.2012 13:01, Peter Khramov

Yury, it's the same at the moment. Albeit time went by, not all of the Russian species have been databased by now. Good news is that things keep moving and soon all the stuff will be put in order.

12.01.2014 13:32, Yuri Semejkin

Hello, Peter! A couple of times I tried to download Minois dryas, but failed. This I have a glitch or website?
And yet for the title. This site Minois dryas there, but it is not in the Far East and determinants Korshunova. Maybe now the butterfly on the other. Called?

12.01.2014 14:04, Yuri Semejkin

He tried again. Same. He writes that the file has been successfully uploaded to the gallery site. But in the gallery or at LK file is not visible.

12.01.2014 23:17, Peter Khramov

Yuri, you are likely too large foty. If not - send me a photo to e-mail, I'll see what it is. Regarding names - synonyms look at the website or just look for the name of the species in those books that you have - dryas-there probably will too, although perhaps in a different generic combinations.

13.01.2014 4:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Minois dryas (in the search box to type dryas ) it on the site and the entire conversation :)
Sorry that got into a discussion

13.01.2014 4:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov

By the way, it is a very long time already in all the books Minois dryas . Yuri, it does differently is not called: you should probably use a more up to date at the moment literature.

13.01.2014 5:29, Yuri Semejkin

Well Basil! Please Ozvuchtte least a couple of more recent sources, which would have sounded like a butterfly Minois dryas. I looked (probably bad) springs of 2002 and 2005 namely: 1). YP Korshunov Butterflies of North Asia M 2002 Determinant nasekomyhDV and Russia Volume V, Part 5 Vladivostok Dal'nauka, 2005, and found nothing.It may be blue, but I do not. Where else ?

13.01.2014 8:20, Shamil Murtazin

In the blue there. I looked right after your post.
Now I found in the directory-determinant "Butterflies of South Ural" fellows and V. Gorbunov Olshvang
The network has its full electronic version. Here Dryads Page:
http://www.urral.ru/vid/507.htm

13.01.2014 9:02, Yuri Semejkin

Shamil Thanks! In this book really is.

13.01.2014 9:09, Shamil Murtazin

On health, Yuri! =)

13.01.2014 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Soon go home and reported as many, if in this whole issue, and elementary "gugleniya" does not help :) On your phone, it is now impossible to make PfP all due respect.

13.01.2014 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I'll start with line (actually they built the base site).
funet.fi: http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/minois/index.html#dryas
fauna europaea: http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=441562
Search result for Minois dryas : https://www.google.ru/search?client=opera&q=minois+dryas&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest
Well, in view of the above Sinev present for № 574. Speaking of Sinev: I can throw it to the post office if you need :)

13.01.2014 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov

In order to stop the useless debate about tribal affiliation butterfly attach a scan of the book:
David Carter "Butterflies and Moths" . Dorling Kindersley Limited, 9 Henrietta Street, London, 1992

Well, in fairness add that in the "Key to the insects of the European part of the USSR" Plavilshchikov H, H, 1950 publication, it stands in the way Satyrus .But now's not the fiftieth year, and classifiers are not asleep :)

13.01.2014 15:36, Yuri Semejkin

Thanks Basil! Separate articles in the internet at Minois dryas I saw. I was confused more. Why 2, with respect to determinants of fresh (not in separate articles), this kind of missing. That began to find out.
On the blue. Thanks for the offer, but I think it will bring me tomorrow.Take a look and if that peresnimu specific page about butterflies Primorye Territory, to me that's enough.

13.01.2014 15:43, Yuri Semejkin

But now's not the fiftieth year, and classifiers are not asleep. They do not nap, but also scan your designated London 1992
But there are also our, with more recent publications determinants Korshunov 2002 and the Russian Far East to the insects of 2005 and there is this kind of reason is not.

13.01.2014 16:11, Yuri Semejkin

Sorry, somehow I missed. Minois dryas in the determinant Korshunova is, stranitsa126

13.01.2014 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yuri, the site focuses mainly on the classification under which mezhunarodnuyu Dryad belongs to the genus Minois and expose this question because the two books very rash (may be taken there infa of the same fifties). Here is an excerpt from Sinev "a snack":)

13.01.2014 16:11, Peter Khramov

Lord, if you want to argue about classification - propose to do this in the appropriate section. Here is a reminder that some of the correct classification of butterflies in the world is not expected. A directory is important that the view can be found, and one title, and on another. And the site is now such a possibility exists.

13.01.2014 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Peter, let me quote George:
"Yuri Semeykin, 01/12/2014 13:32
Hello, Peter! A couple of times I tried to download Minois dryas, but failed. This I have a glitch or website?
And yet for the title. This site Minois dryas there, but it is not in the Far East and determinants Korshunova. Maybe now the butterfly on the other.I called? "So I'm trying to prove that now validly Minois dryas I do not see nothing wrong: it is the debate" on the merits delivered in the subject matter. The site lives, and not on a dead spot :)

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.