Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 ...405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413... 625
As a postscript: I understand of course that can be useful to determine the type, for example, in the field (where the Internet is not always and not at all). But why in such quantities. I think that they have already played a role in determining a particular butterfly and should remove excess, leaving one photo. Of course, if Andrew will not mind :)
Sorry for off-top, I'm still mainly Coleoptera man :) Insects happen to change behaviour in new area. Just an example. There was peaceful ordinary Leptinotarsa decimlineata Say. which fed on solanaceous and did no any harm. At the end of 19th century it spread over France and little by little all over and became famous dreadful potato pest. So far no effective measures found against this ...
Уважаемый, nnsb! Покупался этилацетат 0,90 кг (1000 мл). Первый раз в прошлом году, по нему нареканий нет. "Плохо работающий" этилацетат был куплен в апреле 2014 г (скорее всего предыдущая партия). Если нужно могу его ...
Could be this. However, I see it as miniata male. I upped this a week ago without moving. Yesterday I did where thought reasonable. Miniata can be pale as well. If I was wrong, please move where you think it should be. Would be great though to get some reaction to my 19:18 27/08/2014 request. No offense :)
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lycaena tityrus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Lender.
Corrected data. Not identified → Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Well can't stop bother :) Originally here was the remark in the classification field, "Probably orange variation of erate, hyale or sareptensis" Not croceus, is it? No courage to move it to not identified.....
Let the expert in microleps says his word :) Here in 8th region we got 20 species of Dichrorampha, so I named most likely by appearance, further I surrender.
To Alexandr Belousov: may I remind that the classification specification field is used for subspecies data, also form and age. E.g., "light form" or "third age larva". Person who identified specimen should be noted in the field for additional info. E.g., "specimen raised of larva" or "identified by pic" or any other additional data.
Petr, I already checked that, that wasn't me. Alexandr added this to ID as questionable 16/08/2014 on molbiol.ru and Vasily Sergienko confirmed the ID.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.