Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 2 3

02.03.2021 11:33, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #75584

nordmanni

02.03.2021 8:16, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #73364

lonicerae

26.02.2021 12:06, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #70890

lineola

08.11.2018 10:27, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #70792

This species is identified correctly.

05.11.2018 20:35, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #71915

imho, E. alternata

10.07.2018 11:38, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #70711

Ochlodes sylvanus

14.10.2016 8:54, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #60356

This species is identified correctly.

10.10.2015 19:55, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #45127

alceae IMHO

24.08.2015 10:30, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #42348

This species is identified correctly.

21.07.2015 13:22, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #41642

he is

20.07.2015 8:23, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #41588

Thank you!

17.02.2015 18:22, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #39021

That's just typical Zygaena viciae. In any case, I asked about the scope to doubts have disappeared.

16.02.2015 20:13, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #39021

What is the wingspan of her?

14.02.2015 10:18, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #38979

Yes

13.02.2015 15:26, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #38962

This Zygaena osterodensis.

13.02.2015 15:25, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #38960

The site Entomological Museum Thomas Witt http://www.insecta-web.org/MWM/ lined with photos including pestryanok collection, which has a lot of subspecies Z. viciae. There subspecies with 6 points on the front wing and a red belt on the abdomen, for example http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/vk/dysplay_virt_koll.pl?id=615&fam=Zygaenidae&t= t_entry or ...

12.02.2015 21:53, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #38960

Hmm, is bigger in the viciae similar, while the rest featured on cynarae ...

12.02.2015 20:12, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #38960

What she mm wingspan?

12.02.2015 20:11, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #38956

Z. osterodensis sure there is no more like a Z. minos, but securely from Z. purpuralis appearance is no different.

12.02.2015 20:07, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #38960

Perhaps Zygaena cynarae.

17.01.2015 18:23, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #38526

I, too, for the argus.

21.11.2014 9:17, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #35432

Yes

21.11.2014 9:15, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #35439

and I for purpuraria)

18.11.2014 15:35, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #35326

The female, the male white band on the hind wings is much narrower.

01.11.2014 16:19, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #34720

Zygaena viciae this, lonicerae another form of whiskers.

17.10.2014 13:37, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #34155

This fagata

14.10.2014 19:34, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #34138

fagata, yes

14.10.2014 19:34, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #34139

brumata, right

06.10.2014 10:10, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #33969

ino

11.09.2014 11:45, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #33234

Just do not Thersites, he did not spot near the front of the wing root.

10.09.2014 21:05, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #33234

P. icarus this, P. bellargus just edging is not as thin, and the color is blue.

10.09.2014 21:03, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #33229

This species is identified correctly.

10.09.2014 15:08, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #33210

Anarta trifolii (Hufnagel, 1766)

07.09.2014 19:45, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #33134

This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2014 21:24, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31829

Adippa, yes.

22.07.2014 22:04, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31710

And that P. argus.

15.07.2014 21:28, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31462

Plebejus idas.

15.07.2014 21:27, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31463

It Plebejus idas.

15.07.2014 21:25, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31490

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:25, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31491

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:25, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31492

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:25, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31493

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:24, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #31494

Zygaena viciae

24.04.2014 10:49, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #28776

This species is identified correctly.

10.04.2014 10:33, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #28445

According to my observations in the Moscow region first instance Aricia artaxerxes marked May 30 as Aricia eumedon - on 31 May. This fresh Aricia artaxerxes observed throughout the summer until the beginning of September - very stretched their departure, and the number of generations is difficult to trace. At Aricia eumedon - one generation, years before the second half of July.while in the ...

03.02.2014 13:06, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #1836

Please correct this pic also illlustrates Eulithis populata which is wrong.

02.02.2014 21:36, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #1836

This is Eulithis mellinata

29.01.2014 18:26, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #27127

Good evening! As far as I know, this species hasn't been spotted in Moscow region before. If so, this is the only Zygaena centaureae spot known so far in Moscow region.

09.12.2013 10:19, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #25543

Hyles gallii

21.11.2013 18:44, Fyodor Pudovikov: comment on photo #5747

If there is any reliable feature to make it possible to distinguish these two species by photo? If not, let's be consistent and move this and other photos of these two species to uncertain or move this image to successfully identified as there were no up-to-date founds of A. agestis, or namely specimens which could be only by exterior referred to A. agestis.