Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 2
The thumbnail of the Celaena genus is of Helotropha leucostigma and not of Celaena haworthii.
The thumbnail is one of a Papillonidae.
This is Moma alpium.
I think this is "berbera".
I have to correct it: Subacronicta megacephala.
I also think this is Acronicta megacephala.
Put a thumbnail by the Acontia subgenus because "lucida" is represented.
Put a thumbnail by the Bena genus because "bicolorana" is represented.
A thumbnail could be placed by the Hemiceratinae subfamily to indicate that there are species shown.
Ochyria isn't recognised any more on the Fauna Europaea. The only accepted name is Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata for the species below.
The thumbnail by Euproctis chrysorrhoea is a Tortricidae!
A thumbnail could be placed by the Macrochilo genus to indicate that different species are shown.
A thumbnail could be placed by the Phyllodini tribe to indicate that different species are shown.
A thumbnail could be placed for the Arctiinae subfamily to indicate that different species are shown.
A thumbnail could be placed on top to indicate that several species are shown.
It is important to emphasize that only the lower species is Sauritinia concisa.
It is important to emphasize that only the upper species is Cresera hieroglyphica.
I think this is complana.
I think this is ochrata.
This is Idaea rusticata.
Both comae as griseata are present in Estonia. As far as I know, only genital examination can give a certain determination.
The sample thumbnail of the genus Acacis isn' t correct (it's an Apollo). Better put one of Acacis veritata.
The sample thumbnail of the Anticlea genus isn't corret (it's Earophila badiata). Better place one of Anticlea derivata.
This is Philereme transversata.
For me, it is Lythria purpuraria.
Certainly not linariata. I think it is icterata.
So the picture is very probably of Pasiphila chloerata.
I think this is subfuscata.
This is Pasiphila rectangulata.
This is Pasiphila rectangulata.
This is Xanthorhoe montanata.
The sample thumbnail of the genus Chloroclysta isn't correct (it's Dystroma citrata). Better put a picture of Chloroclysta siterata.
Following external caracteristics, there is no possibility to make a difference between variata and britannica. For the males, there is a difference in the antennae, only visible after enlargement. Otherwise, only genital examination can give a definite answer.
The sample thumbnail of the genus Dysphania isn't correct (it's Melanitis leda). Better put a picture of one of the Dysphania species.
This is pusaria.
This is Scopula caricaria.
This is Scopula immutata.
The sample picture of the subgenus Dyscia isn't correct (it's a Gelechiidae). Better put a picture of one of the Dyscia species.
It's a male. For this species the difference between male and female is very manifest.
it's a male.
The sample thumbnail of the Asovia genus isn't correct (it is a Noctuidae). Better put a picture of the maeoticaria species.
The sample thumbnail of the Itame genus isn't correct anymore. It a picture of the species brunneata what changed from Itame to Macaria.
This is obviously vespertaria.
This is obviously vespertaria.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (21.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:20, P. Khramov: Lampyridae / Tentatively identified...
- 21:35, A. M.: Sure. It's done. (Sorry to say I ha...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Butterflies and music: Moonpools & Caterpillars / Nurses
