Insecta.pro Community
Who said that it is synonymous different types. Generally I wonder how there are define eaprosto tropics.
In my opinion, it similis
Cepphis advenaria
Polypogon tentacularia
tristata
Wrong is Dichonia, likely aeruginea. This also applies to the rest of the images that ekz.iz Serbia
Eupithecia pusillata
Hadena confusa
Lasionycta imbecilla
Idaea aversata
Pasiphila rectangulata
I am a supporter thalassina, they are so beautiful
Tathea ocularis because
Well, edging a light (not necessarily white), and something like this feature working. But in fact this pair have to look for complex traits such as Alexander said, straightening desirable. Regarding this ind., Just in case I asked I.Kostyuka- in his opinion is viridata.
virgaureata
This, in my opinion nothing to Chlorissa not have it Thalera fimbrialis
It actually Jodis lactearia
In fact, we should not rush to scatter, in my opinion is a viridata. Regarding the signs, you can see how people are trying to find here http://www.entomo.pl/forum/viewtopic.php?f=87&t=23491 Incidentally, all right scattered
thalassina-bright and beautiful as the contigua
Gluphisia crenata
Not really good shot, nothing else, the female can not offer vulgata
Scopula nemoraria
There are no other similar kind
This-quadrifasiata
And this (and other) -ferrugata
I would say that this is not ferrugata, and spadicearia
Idaea straminata (Catalog Viidaleppa ssp.karafutonis), if there is still something similar there, on the European side has a similar deversaria, but there is none
Note to the form Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata (removed from the base of 11.09.2014 23:17): GME 3-quadrifasiata (quadrifasciata-auct.) - without a first description
Lycia sp. cm. comment on molbiol (objectified. butterflies)
It is not euritetsiya and Pasiphila sp., Likely rectangulata (Europe so precisely, and there on the blue of another similar-subcinctata)
According to Synev, Eupithecia sophia is distributed in the neighbour region.
Type incorrectly defined it-Pasiphila debiliata
Error text. In the photo-Ukrainian Zhakova butterfly (I caught it in the same place in 2010), the text -in Ukraine lacks.
This one is Lycophotia porphyrea, corrected its name in identifying.
Not biselata at all but Cabera pusaria fairly flown.
Not Agriopis aurantiaria, but most probably Erannis golda, Djakonov, 1929. Anyway I'm not long in far east ones. Where this was shot is the most interesting question there.
There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it. E.lanceata.
There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it. This one is also H.punctinalis.
There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it. This is H.punctinalis.
There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it. 3076 is X.biriviata.
There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it. 1909 image is I.biselata.
1778 photo is E.lanceata.
Photos #1955 and 1956 belong to H.punctinalis.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (21.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:20, P. Khramov: Lampyridae / Tentatively identified...
- 21:35, A. M.: Sure. It's done. (Sorry to say I ha...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Streets: insects names
- Russian Lepidoptera in Soviet postcards by the publishing house “Izobrazitelnoye iskusstvo”
