In viciae confusa is a form very similar to, if you have time you can see a collection of Witt http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/vk/dysplay_virt_koll.pl?land=en
Scotopteryx, judging by the state of copies. at the end of May, with high probability we can assume-mucronata, luridata at this time just beginning to fly
I think it is not necessary to put in inaccurate copies. Ponomarev and Nikulina, florida at this time does not have to fly (at least occasional shabby)
L.farinata, according to the data given in the article, the second is only for the south of Kazakhstan (Almaty) and further south. All isledovanie copies. in the article of July, the June-this. A review of the species of Lithostege Hübner, [1825] 1816 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Larentiinae), occurring in Iran and adjacent countries, with description of two new species from Iran and ...
gigantea with a yellow head, collitoides- black (sm.sayt lishaynitsy Russia and neighboring countries Dubatolov)
It's definitely not ochridata, while inaccuracies intricata (for evtetsy should be shot on the top and a good resolution). Here, like, still picture of copies. He generally uninformative
In addition, apicipunctata distinct boundary line and a round rear fenders. At the site that you bring only the first can still be apicipunctata, the rest I think, an erroneous definition (of course I could be wrong). For us it would be simplicity and grated floslactata immutata. We must look blue, that there is a careful and try to measure up.I have now only the tablet and do not have access to ...
Note to the form Anticollix sparsatus (removed from the base of 20.09.2014 12:24): This is not a separate species, from GME 3-sparsata
Note to the form Watsonarctia casta (removed from the base of 20.09.2014 12:40): Watsonarstia deserta (= casta), is one kind of, not two
I wrote, likely believing blue. These two kinds of apparently twins who differ in the reverse side of the front wings (see. The Japanese) Here are the images shown here are close http://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42namisyaku2.html
It is, in fact, Hemithea aestivaria. Here you can still somehow be determined, but photos from this angle, and if put, it is with the other photos of this specimen. Otherwise do not understand the meaning of the photo.
1, the word "confident" too much in your comments, I said that I probably now hold this view 2 if the butterfly is not cooked, the authoritative opinion even spices, only a guess. 3 You say that the article was determined by Zolotukhin, an issue on which the image is similar to your copies.and why were 2 under fagariey clearly fagarii? 4 I had the opportunity to images konspersarii to be 5 ...
Generally krokota mountain views, in the Ukraine in the old collections recorded at two points of the Lviv region., And it's kind of like, Angerona prunaria
fagaria only that, the rest is likely to-innocentaria. Both conspersaria also likely innocentaria (light so precisely)
And you do not suffer, it is likely fimbriata, and that, judging by the presence of white, then we all tirreniki near Kiev. Also clever book says that vnutennyaya black border on the hind wings tirenniki more oblique, but not concave. Look for example tirreniku exposed Barko section Noctuidae, Noctuinae