From sources (http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/theclinae/cigaritis/, http://yutaka.it-n.jp/), it follows that in the south of Vietnam, there are two kinds of similar color:Cigaritis lohita(two subspeciesCigaritis lohita batinaandCigaritis lohita himalayanus) andCigaritis syama(with one subspeciesCigaritis syama peguanus). According to ...
Dear experts! Is it possible to reliably distinguish between a photo of a maleHyponephele lycaonof the imagoHyponephele lupinus? The photo living butterfly, side view, underside of the wings, front wing is seen by half, about like this: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/12149, location shooting - Volgograd. I do not want to upload a photo, if there is no chance of definition.
Rod put down automatically because it was in the file name: pontia.jpg. The only pity is that the page kind of photos are not recognized. The situation is deadlocked. Rhode reliably known species belong in question appears in the photos exactly certain, but it will not see anywhere else and you will not find on the search, if you do not know the identification number.
This photo at the same time is here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8851 here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8852
Indeed, ambiguous, until you know that meant calling, you will not understand how to correctly pronounce!
Dear experts, please pay attention to this picture! In my unprofessional opinion, it depicted a butterfly on it is no different from this: http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/zizula/pygmaea-1v.jpg. Maybe you need more information? Is it possible to define a species?