E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...3 4 5 6 7 8

28.08.2015 7:31, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #2402

Buck

28.08.2015 7:31, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #2401

Female

27.08.2015 20:18, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #38998

There is information that such a spot just in the male should be: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30010001.html http://flutters.org/home/photogallery/index.php?level=picture&id=1851

27.08.2015 17:53, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #38968

Basil, here too, male and female

27.08.2015 16:58, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #12961

There are different instances in the group, perhaps even of different sex

27.08.2015 16:43, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #38969

It should be in the same group with the # 38968 and put the male and female

27.08.2015 16:20, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #38998

Alexander, and what is opposed to females?

27.08.2015 15:28, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42463

Peter, please replace this picture №33614, if so, retaining the old number.

26.08.2015 19:01, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #11941

It should be combined into a group with 11942

25.08.2015 21:08, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41345

Alexander, I think, that your copy - it's a male E. core godartii f. layardi (http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30270020.html)

25.08.2015 15:44, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42373

Good!

25.08.2015 15:41, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42371

Alexander, in this photo and photo №42372 shows the same specimen, top and bottom view respectively. Indeed, if we do not take into account that there is a kind of Euploea orontobates Fruhstorfer, 1910, the most this instance resembles E. core. In determining the use of the following materials; http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30255001.html Please note that it is the female (photo №42373) and a ...

25.08.2015 14:28, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42373

This comment implies that the author does not object to the transfer of an additional photo in the gallery. The problem in fact is not far off!

24.08.2015 18:19, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42289

Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition

24.08.2015 18:19, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42290

Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition

24.08.2015 18:18, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42194

Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition

23.08.2015 20:26, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42246

Spialia galba

23.08.2015 20:26, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42245

Spialia galba

23.08.2015 20:26, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42244

Spialia galba

23.08.2015 15:09, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #19884

Invalid combined into a group with photo # 19833

23.08.2015 14:23, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42327

Lampides boeticus

23.08.2015 14:22, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42328

Lampides boeticus

23.08.2015 8:38, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on Zizina otis

According to this source ([9] Tree of Life (funet.fi), 2012), there is a subspecies Z. o. sangra (Moore, [1866]). Please add.

14.08.2015 9:10, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42055

In connection with the innovations, can I tie it on their own photo to the genusPieris? If not, please do so moderators.

09.08.2015 6:41, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42088

Vasily rights, I have the same thing happened before the hyphen is set manually.

04.08.2015 21:33, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42055

Can habitat will: open, xerophytic community near suburban areas of butterflies were there Lycaena thersamon, Hyponephele lupinus, Pontia edusa, Iphiclides podalirius?

04.08.2015 21:22, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42083

:) Dilettantes excusable on the abdomen do not watch! Type correctly defined, have fun.

04.08.2015 20:35, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42083

Undecided, just a guess, Basil on photo # 33972 male with the same color, and photo # 33970 female on the other. If agreed, the right to information to the photo set. Probably just the variability in color.

04.08.2015 20:08, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42083

Male?

04.08.2015 18:40, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42055

Not measured, unfortunately! Yes, and I do not remember, it was a year ago. Only on the flower (inflorescence) can navigate. I do not mind the cabbage.

03.08.2015 12:14, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42055

Pieris rapae?

02.08.2015 20:44, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42047

Neptis rivularis?

02.08.2015 20:38, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #42046

Neptis rivularis?

30.07.2015 10:27, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41952

And characteristically, new species are often described in those taxa that are popular with collectors (in the broad sense). Communication with commerce on the face, and the theory of evolution - alas!

30.07.2015 9:59, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41952

As for the taxonomy, especially at the level of species, genera, in my opinion, works recognized authoritative opinions of individual authors. Communication with the theory of evolution is not captured.

30.07.2015 9:34, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41952

Not at all, not the whole world.

30.07.2015 9:08, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41952

Basil, the world continues to live with ... Darwin?

30.07.2015 0:35, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41965

Euphydryas ichnea

23.07.2015 12:18, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on Limenitis camilla

Is it possible to formalize the data dissemination in the region to this kind displayed in the directory when searching?

20.07.2015 15:13, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on Clossiana iphigenia

Not solved it now!

17.07.2015 15:02, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41486

Brenthis hecate

07.07.2015 19:08, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on Eilema griseola

:)

07.07.2015 16:03, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on Eilema griseola

I agree with Basil on a single observation in one part of the range can not make a generalization for the species as a whole. Namely, the total for the kind of information is seen on this page. If Yuri took the trouble to describe in this report all the circumstances of the individual case (there was something there somewhere, observation of so many copies.for so some seasons), then it may be, it ...

06.07.2015 21:01, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41131

Autographa gamm?

05.07.2015 16:39, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41196

Zygaena osterodensis

05.07.2015 10:12, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #29280

I think that the definition of the copies. (photo # 29278 and # 29280) mistake. It does not match any coloring or area; http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/chazara/ http://www.eurobutterflies.com/sp/prieuri.php Perhaps itChazara enervata. The same applies to the copies. on photo # 29281 - # 29282

04.07.2015 20:03, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41175

Melanargia russiae

27.06.2015 23:57, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #41005

Boloria dia?

27.06.2015 21:30, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #40990

Agapeta hamana

27.06.2015 17:38, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on photo #40984

https://www.google.ru/maps/place/7514.+Sk.+No:9,+%C4%B0stiklal,+80020+Osmaniye+Merkez%2FOsmaniye,+%D0%A2%D1%83%D1%80%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F/@60.9524192,76.8474501,286m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x152f2028586ace37:0xeadf3c868a4d6ecf?hl=ru

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.