Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385... 627
Peter, not much in the news topic, but the theme of the last kommentariya- some species are not illustrated because there were doubts about the photos. You've got an agreement with Andrei http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35588 was definitely on the photos from a third-party resources. It has all unnecessary and can be removed up everything to illustrate? Andrew or until such leave of comments?
Corrected data. Not identified → Notocelia roborana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
If Peter believes that the pull of insects in general, as the minmum beetles supported by two hands - yet it is my group in which more than a butterfly that I was more interested in terms of photography. And the family of ground beetles TB So I am for! And there will be more active participants in no doubt.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Oreta carnea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Sergei Kotov.
Inside gossip leaves the cocoon in which to spend the winter pupa Selenia dentaria.
Probably yes, if there are several clutches. It is also possible that the remaining (which poorly-green) just empty, that will not be developed.
Corrected data. Not identified → Oreta carnea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Paracrama dulcissima / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Chloriola gratissima / Irina Nikulina.
Exactly. Even our grandmother spent on this stuff. Shitty thing after all ...
Vasiliy- diagnosis CUT !!!
This species is identified correctly.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Limenitis helmanni / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Chersonesia rahria / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.
Corrected data. Phoebis neocypris / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Phoebis neocypris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Phoebis neocypris / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus.
In Vietnam, it meets Cirrochroa tyche mithila Moore, 1872: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hel/710170010.html
Judging by the lower wing underside closer Perisama philinus
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Apparently (and also the top) -ona.Spasibo!
I just warned against hasty assessments of the results of the search engines.
And why prosecutors immediately below rastrely? Prosecutors have another problem.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 50—65 mm.
Not in KMV drink seltzer and pass inspection body. With the current course ye are cheaper. If the situation is normalized, in late January, we want to Tai in Khao Lak.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
There are only two kinds of kind of like:Loepa sikkimathis one.
On underside it will clear everything, and you can not peek androkonii. And I caught this kind.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hypanartia lethe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
This double page http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23241
This double page http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23242
Perisama saussurei? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/Macrolepidoptera15seit_0219.jpg
Green pingas longer happens - it means
Stas! Do you like all subspecies are. Do it all here.
This species is identified correctly.
A rare and unique species of the genus in the RFE Cilix
http://izumoga.com/saninmoth/nakamonkagiba.html
http://www.jpmoth.org/Drepanidae/Drepaninae/Cilix_filipjevi_malivora.html
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan, Australian.
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis tschetverikovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis tschetverikovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Dear experts! Is it possible to reliably distinguish between a photo of a maleHyponephele lycaonof the imagoHyponephele lupinus? The photo living butterfly, side view, underside of the wings, front wing is seen by half, about like this: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/12149, location shooting - Volgograd. I do not want to upload a photo, if there is no chance of definition.
Do not be scared, it's fixable)
Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis thisbe / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis tschetverikovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis tschetverikovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Caloptilia betulicola / Tentatively identified / Nikolai Vladimirov → Not identified.
Next page