Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570... 627

13.09.2011 23:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9507

Moved to identified.

13.09.2011 23:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4391

Thanks for reminding. Goes to "identified successfully".

13.09.2011 23:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4634

To identified.

13.09.2011 23:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10627

Moved.

13.09.2011 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #10447

This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #10446

This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10660

Thanks to all, goes to paphia.

12.09.2011 7:33, Pirx: comment on Inachis io in Madagascar?

The plants under the butterflies also confused me:for example, well-recognized and completely non-tropical physostegia and buddleia.Buddleia is still not quite "completely non-tropical", rather a southern genus.

11.09.2011 20:19, amara: comment on Remarkable image Cerambycidae

[Acanthocinus nodosus (F.) in flight, Louisiana, USA]Thanks for that one. I was just thinking how these guys with such long antennae keep them in flight, aimed somewhat backwards or ...? And now I know. Thank you.And now I am wondering that it should be pretty tough not to hit something like branches or leaves flying this way deep in a thick forest.

10.09.2011 22:42, gonkem1986: comment on Far Eastern teliphone.

Yes, it's interesting,but the same person found it and described it?I had an idea-since no one else has found it for more than a hundred years since the first discovery,and it is possible that that specimen belonged to the most northern species of T. niger from neighboring China, then maybe there was (or is) some relict in Olga Bay to the north of the main range small population of this ...

09.09.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9220

Moved from undetermined.

09.09.2011 23:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10456

Thanks, moved.

09.09.2011 23:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10454

Moved to Idaea serpentata as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10452/. Approval needed...

09.09.2011 23:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10453

Moved to Idaea serpentata as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10452/. Approval needed...

09.09.2011 23:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10451

Thanks, moved.

09.09.2011 23:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10452

Moved.

09.09.2011 23:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10394

Goes to E. linariata.

09.09.2011 13:52, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10623

Save Our Spirits.

09.09.2011 1:56, А.Й.Элез: comment on Virtual map of entomologists

No one offers to sign with your first and last name without fail. You can just use nicknames, with the area of interest as a characteristic (as it is now on the forum). In my opinion, it is not the list itself that is more important, but the location of entomologists.And, besides, is the possibility of repeating that precedent excluded now, without any map, by some other actor?Everything is ...

08.09.2011 12:21, Анфим: comment on Miners. websites, photos, and questions

"House" of the bagworm butterfly-PsychidaeFor " Excuse me, but what is it?" there is a topic: Classification of insects -> Who is it? http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showforum=53Every Russian speaker distinguishes between "who" and"what"! A "house" is an inanimate object. I'm interested in the BEHAVIOR in this case: WHO DID THIS? Here above is also a "nut job". And I suggested something ...

08.09.2011 10:55, Victor Titov: comment on Barbels. Callidium

Who is it? 10 mmTranscarpathian lowland. 27.VII.2011 Phymatodes pusillus, I think IMHO Hylotrupes bajulus is rickety a bit.In deep pardon! Obmishurilsya! Fornax13 is absolutely right, here is the confirmation: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/eng/hylbajdk.htm

05.09.2011 12:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7732

Moved.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10541

Males again and again...

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10464

Goes to males.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7735

To males.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7728

Moved to males.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7048

To males.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7736

To males.

05.09.2011 12:15, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7726

Goes to males.

05.09.2011 12:15, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4031

Moved to males.

05.09.2011 0:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10471

Goes to identified.

05.09.2011 0:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10469

Identified.

05.09.2011 0:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10468

Goes to "identified successfully".

05.09.2011 0:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10472

To identified.

05.09.2011 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10529

The underside of a male on #10528.

04.09.2011 20:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10506

Well, everybody agreed. Moved to A. oxyacanthae, identified.

04.09.2011 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5879

Females are just harder to shoot. They are high flyers, and can be rare met below tree crowns.

04.09.2011 15:05, Vernon Antoine Brou Jr.: comment on Traps

Can you tell me if: confused: there are any traps along the way for night butterflies? It is desirable that you can do it yourself. If there is a photo, throw a description on the forum or on the soap tyomka@lianet.ru[Here are a few images of my lepidoptera traps I have used over the past 42 years]