Insecta.pro Community

25.02.2011 17:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6105

Red cheeks.

25.02.2011 15:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3353

To go.

25.02.2011 13:05, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6222

Dear gentlemen moderators, please, add species and genus, to move this one to "uncertain"...

25.02.2011 13:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3520

Vasily, you're on!

25.02.2011 13:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6391

Thanks, moved.

24.02.2011 21:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2877

Ok then, moved.

24.02.2011 19:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2877

Dmitry, this was shot in "The house of butterflies", Nizhny Novgorod. What did they have? As far as I can remember, they had no rhadamantus but helena. Shot about two years ago.

24.02.2011 19:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6383

To "uncertain".

24.02.2011 15:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6377

Evgeny Karolinsky's comment is moved from the species photo page to the description one. I'd like to pay attention once more to that: on the species photo page you may discuss the very shot, is it good or not, what species is on it. But the species features, e. g. its taxonomic status, is possible to discuss only at the species description page. Also, being at the species photo page you can press ...

24.02.2011 0:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6383

Evgeny, you're somehow overdramatizing things. You can see its underside there, for instance: http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Japonica_adusta.htm.

23.02.2011 13:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5492

Evgeny, I looked at the original shot and noticed that it's somehow shadowy and even after some retouching the butterfly's hair is still black. If we enlighten it a little bit more, we can see it's colored brown, but this photo sucks. To get normal color balance it should be seriously retouched, that can be difficult considering how many shots are published daily on the website. Also there we can ...

23.02.2011 1:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6383

Moved to J. lutea.

23.02.2011 1:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6366

Yury, is there any underside photo, maybe?

23.02.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6366

If approve, to the database then...

22.02.2011 23:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5820

Terminator!

22.02.2011 18:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6304

Moved.

22.02.2011 18:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6246

Good. Moved and activated.

22.02.2011 16:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6382

Moved to theclas.

22.02.2011 16:46, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6366

To "uncertain".

22.02.2011 16:46, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6246

Funny guy. But not databased anyway. Evgeny, false start or some technical bug?

22.02.2011 16:45, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6247

To "uncertain", amen.

22.02.2011 16:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6261

"Uncertain" then.

22.02.2011 16:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6239

Moved.

22.02.2011 16:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6266

Done.

22.02.2011 16:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6294

Done.

22.02.2011 16:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6312

Let it be female.

22.02.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6316

Ok.

22.02.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6335

Moved.

22.02.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6362

To go.

22.02.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6350

Moved.

22.02.2011 12:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6321

Moved.

22.02.2011 2:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6399

Moved. What a shot location ;--)

22.02.2011 1:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2794

Comment concerned the species not its photo, moved to the species description page http://lepidoptera.pro/species/issoria-eugenia/.

22.02.2011 1:01, Peter Khramov: comment on Issoria eugenia

I look at this title, and I think ... Maybe it's better to be Issoria, a? ..

22.02.2011 1:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6374

Moved to males.

21.02.2011 21:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6258

To go to "identified successfully".

21.02.2011 21:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6354

Moved.

21.02.2011 21:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6201

Goes to males. Evgeny, why approved if it's you who identified that? Or had some doubts before?

21.02.2011 21:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6355

Went to "identified successfully".

21.02.2011 21:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6291

Moved.

21.02.2011 19:31, Peter Khramov: comment on Papilio ulysses

Well, tell me, Basil, what ways Ulysses got?)

21.02.2011 19:29, Peter Khramov: comment on Sauritinia concisa

In the photo - the bottom butterfly.

21.02.2011 19:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6407

Photo moved to S. concisa.

21.02.2011 19:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6238

To go.

21.02.2011 19:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6242

Moved.

21.02.2011 19:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6241

Moved/activated.

21.02.2011 19:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6233

Moved.

21.02.2011 13:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6215

Done too.

21.02.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6231

Done.

21.02.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6228

Photo moved.

Plebejus pseudargon B.H.

Lycaenidae

Euphoria lurida Fabricius, 1775

Scarabaeidae

Trichopoda pennipes Fabricius, 1781

Tachinidae

Lydella stabulans Meigen, 1824

Tachinidae

Ancyla asiatica Friese, 1922

Apidae