Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576... 630

10.08.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9866

Thanks for approving, moved to "identified successfully".

10.08.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9908

Right, I've just screwed it up...

09.08.2011 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #9900

Seems to be Melitaea didyma, but can just be similar to. I'll check it out.

09.08.2011 22:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9892

Thanks, moving to identified.

09.08.2011 22:07, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9891

Danke, goes to P. stolida.

09.08.2011 19:15, Peter Khramov: comment on Image uploading: new feature

Now while uploading a whole archive, in case there is the same shot/caught location or date for all photos included, you may note this information once in the file uploader form, so it will be applied to all those shots.

08.08.2011 20:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3539

Moved to the new species.

07.08.2011 14:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9846

Moved to P. edusa.

07.08.2011 14:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9845

Moved to P. edusa.

06.08.2011 22:26, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8931

Ok, goes from P. regalis to H. costalis.

06.08.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9849

Deal, let's consider question solved.

06.08.2011 22:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9197

As for Turkey and its "residents": http://lepidoptera.pro/catalog/?tax[]=6963&oc=or&om=or&oz=or&ocou=or&country[]=1012&size=s&perpage=50&order=lat, that means every beast can be there. Goes to Pieris brassicae, without gender.

06.08.2011 22:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9050

Goes to A. rumicis.

06.08.2011 22:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9049

Moved to A. rumicis.

04.08.2011 17:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9837

Goes to M. alternata.

03.08.2011 23:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9459

While admin was on vacation, he shot such too )

03.08.2011 23:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9088

Moved from undetermined to A. odorata.

03.08.2011 23:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9013

Moved to "uncertain".

03.08.2011 23:37, Peter Khramov: comment on Admin is on vacation till about August 3

On hold again.

03.08.2011 23:34, Peter Khramov: comment on Lasionycta proxima

Basil, thanks for the correction. Your comment has transferred to the photo page, because it relates specifically to a particular image, but not to the form itself.

03.08.2011 22:54, Peter Khramov: comment on Mapping: questions

Ok then, will add that in a to-do list...

03.08.2011 22:37, Peter Khramov: comment on Hyles lineata

Alexander, the exact location is unknown, but it is still North America ...

31.07.2011 17:11, Dmitry Vlasov: comment on Entomological examination

You probably don't need an entomological examination, but an entomological examination by a specialist from Rospotrebnadzor or the Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology...Such a survey provides information not only on the type of synanthropic insect or tick, but also on the room and m. b. control measures...

31.07.2011 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9513

Hm, looks rather dark for that. But ok, let it be promissa. I just caught lots of sponsa this year, so. Maybe, see it in others then. Sorry.

29.07.2011 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9793

Pieris napi male (Linnaeus, 1758).

28.07.2011 10:38, ALEKSANDER: comment on My collection of butterflies and beetles

Oh, the material is ruined for nothing. A dust collector, not a collection.YES, it's a pity, not a scientific collection, but as a decoration nothing sorry for the criticism, in the photo DSC01805.JPG the butterflies are not spread out very well. A large collection is good,but with labels it will be just fine!This post was edited by ALEKSANDER - 07/28/2011 10: 40