Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143... 169

14.11.2013 1:55, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #5747

Evgeny Karolinsky, what do you say?

14.11.2013 1:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24950

Me too, I'm nearly sure this is right, however the angle is not good to see in details if the pattern is specific. We'll feel easier leaving like this :)

14.11.2013 1:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24950

Corrected data. Not identified → Hedya ochroleucana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.11.2013 0:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24951

Corrected data. Not identified → Hedya ochroleucana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.11.2013 0:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24951

Is this photo of another species? Or #24950 is the same specimen?

14.11.2013 0:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24950

Tough to move with such angle. Maybe something different, say, Metendothenia atropunctana or some Apotomis?

12.11.2013 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21045

Corrected data. Lymantria fumida / Yuri Semejkin → Lymantria dispar / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.11.2013 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21044

Corrected data. Lymantria fumida / Yuri Semejkin → Lymantria dispar / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.11.2013 21:27, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21046

Corrected data. Lymantria fumida / Yuri Semejkin → Lymantria dispar / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.11.2013 21:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21046

Irina, many thanks, larvae indeed look different, moving it.

12.11.2013 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24855

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

12.11.2013 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21046

Turns out we'll move it to Lymantria dispar anyway. L. fumida is distributed in Japan, Korea and China, no info about Russia. Waiting for disproof.

12.11.2013 2:11, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24852

Corrected data. Not identified → Celastrina filipjevi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.11.2013 2:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3365

Corrected data. Leucoma salicis / Confidently identified / Dina Rogatnykh → Leucoma candida / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.11.2013 2:08, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3364

Corrected data. Candida → Leucoma candida.

12.11.2013 2:06, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3364

Corrected data. Leucoma salicis / Confidently identified / Dina Rogatnykh → Candida / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.11.2013 23:53, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #17802

Corrected data. Male → Female.

11.11.2013 3:01, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #1127

I did it authomatically, here are females, there are males, and who are here? imagos. :) The next neighbour pic features lots of males, was going to move it too, yet haven't. I think it's right as it's impossible to see clearly gender in this photo, whilst would be better to comment the very photo with a remark that this is a male flight (of course, if it's indeed males as species females do ...

11.11.2013 2:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13177

Corrected data. Tentatively identified / Imago → Confidently identified / Male.

11.11.2013 2:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #1127

Corrected data. Male → Imago.

11.11.2013 2:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Crambus whitmerellus

Question realized is removed from synonyms, who should be found.

11.11.2013 1:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24760

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

11.11.2013 1:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Crambus whitmerellus

auct. if I'm not mistaken

11.11.2013 1:41, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Crambus whitmerellus

That is not synonymous, that's for sure, but in the literature of this kind Mauger appeared as C. pratellus, but then need another term, but not synonymous.

11.11.2013 1:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Crambus whitmerellus

No, this is not a synonym for this North American species, perhaps as the previously cited Crambus pratella, to describe.

10.11.2013 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24759

Corrected data. Not identified → Cerura vinula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.11.2013 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24758

Corrected data. Not identified → Cerura vinula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.11.2013 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24757

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Archips podana / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2013 12:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13466

Corrected data. Not identified → Niphanda fusca / Confidently identified / Dmitry Borisyuk.

09.11.2013 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24167

There's only one similar in this gender, Symphlebia haenkei, but still rather unlike.

09.11.2013 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24167

Corrected data. Not identified → Symphlebia fulminans / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

09.11.2013 13:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #9993

This is not Gandaritis pyraliata, I know it, I've examined this one for long, poor angle, sharpness, but anyway the colour is different and there is no root shade costally to the wing margin. This species for this moth is more appropriate here :)