Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372... 627

17.01.2015 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38526

Corrected data. Plebejus subsolanus / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow → Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.01.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Asota paphos

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

17.01.2015 18:22, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38525

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2015 18:22, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38524

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2015 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38543

Now soak put a lot of anyone. Mustilia / Mustilizans, Ericeia etc. The material is interesting, in short. It is necessary to put :)

17.01.2015 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38544

Corrected data. Not identified → Hypopyra lactipex / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.01.2015 16:12, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30141

Thank you, Sasha, then that's what I realized when mothsofborneo back :) - Suriga suriga Schaus sensu Holloway, 1976, but is already too late to withdraw the question)

17.01.2015 16:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Hypopyra lactipex

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

17.01.2015 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38528

Corrected data. Not identified → Achlya flavicornis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.01.2015 9:37, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38531

Corrected data. Not identified → Blasticorhinus ussuriensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.01.2015 9:37, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38530

Inaccurate, because there is Blasticorhinus unduligera, but its image is only at Kononenko are similar, but it turns out that Blasticorhinus ussuriensis. :)

17.01.2015 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38533

Corrected data. → Xanthomantis cornelia.

16.01.2015 19:42, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38520

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2015 19:42, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38513

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2015 19:41, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38514

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2015 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38519

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Cupido argiades / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38518

Corrected data. Not identified → Xanthia togata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38517

Corrected data. Not identified → Ecpyrrhorrhoe rubiginalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 11:14, Diogen: comment on Need sweeping entomological nets

Entosphinx. I bought from them, if I remember correctly, for 35 bucks. A good strong net.

16.01.2015 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #30229

Corrected data. Not identified → Saliocleta widagdoi / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.01.2015 23:29, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33671

Sash, almost for the first time did not even looked at boldsystems, these Asian sites somehow amicably convinced, moreover, that used to trust jpmoth) But in general as something not very superficially in Nacoleia fit .. We must try to understand

15.01.2015 22:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30238

Eoophyla sp. See. Comment on the photo # 30242

15.01.2015 22:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30242

Eoophyla sp. If you discuss at "very similar" to the jpmoth.org it is very similar to the uncertain under Eoophyla sp3 http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/50_PYRALOIDEA/Crambidae/63.6_Acentropinae/framepage_Acentropinae.html And perhaps that's similar to that of Borneo - Eoophyla boernickei http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=282911 Prior to the form, I ...

15.01.2015 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #29859

Corrected data. Not identified → Pomasia salutaris / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.01.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38487

Corrected data. Not identified → Charaxes paphianus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38475

Corrected data. Not identified → Charaxes anticlea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38474

Corrected data. Not identified → Charaxes anticlea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38379

Corrected data. Not identified → Graphium megaera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38378

Corrected data. Not identified → Graphium megaera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38391

Corrected data. Not identified → Graphium sarpedon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38390

Corrected data. Not identified → Graphium sarpedon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38275

Corrected data. Not identified → Papilio zagreus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38274

Corrected data. Not identified → Papilio zagreus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 18:37, Alex Dumchus: comment on Papilio

Returning to the sailing vessels: the site has subgenera - ahillides, geraklides etc., But Chilasa reason no .... disorder!

15.01.2015 10:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38506

Corrected data. Not identified → Helicoverpa armigera / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.01.2015 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38507

Corrected data. Not identified → Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.01.2015 22:29, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21211

I propose to continue the discussion of the geography in the system area.

14.01.2015 13:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #14562

Basil, we just have not once discussed topic about the removal of photons and about a replacement image. I propose to share these concepts, otherwise there is a mess, you know? Well, that is the phrase "This is a double photo # 38351, must be replaced by" to be more correct, but for the ph Zoran'a, which was recently uploaded a lot of photons are exactly the same, it's just a true "remove".So ...

14.01.2015 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15866

"Tug of War" turns interesting :))))

14.01.2015 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15709

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15708 group.

14.01.2015 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15690

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15689 group.

14.01.2015 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15702

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15703 group.

14.01.2015 8:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6518

While I can not say (((We wait

14.01.2015 6:22, Ма79: comment on Forest bug from the USA

Good afternoon! I immediately apologize if the topic is not in the appropriate section.A forest bug flew to me in Moscow in a parcel from the USA, Virginia. Alive. Kill or throw out an emigrant who flew across the ocean in the cold did not raise a hand... Maybe someone is interested in studying stinki bug from USA ?