Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533... 629

08.02.2013 18:20, Aleksandr Ermakov: comment on Project of the new Red Data Book of the Russian Federation

In the Northern Urals, Nitensov met in stony mountain tundras.

08.02.2013 11:36, Peter Khramov: comment on Sciota imperialella

Vladimir, we now have information about the kinds can be added through a special form (see ref. Adding information on the form on the right top of the page description of the species). There she will be in a right place and in the future - also participate in the selection of geography. If you're going to add more - try to do it through the form.

07.02.2013 22:21, Vladimir Savchuk: comment on photo #1016

This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2013 20:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #16235

Moved.

07.02.2013 19:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20712

Goes to.

07.02.2013 15:54, Lev Bely: comment on Scientists revealed the secret of the diamondback moth

Genetic research of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella has revealed the secret of the world's worst agricultural pest that costs about $5 billion damage every year in crop losses and insecticides. An international consortium also involving two Australian scientists has decoded the genetic blueprint, depicting how rapidly P. xylostella larvae evolve resistance to insecticides. Professor ...

06.02.2013 16:06, Peter Khramov: comment on CAPTCHA at new user registration

So the spam finally freaked me out. Since now we use CAPTCHA at new user registration. If something goes wrong, please don't hesitate to e-mail me directly, and we'll sort that out.

06.02.2013 0:25, Valeria Tichenko: comment on photo #20733

Oops, they're synonyms!))))))

06.02.2013 0:21, Valeria Tichenko: comment on photo #20734

No any, only I didn't put the family, so the system might haven't caught that.

05.02.2013 23:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20731

Moved to "identified successfully".

05.02.2013 22:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Lymantria dubia

Ok, then put away.

05.02.2013 18:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20737

Still not coania? Moved.

05.02.2013 18:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20736

Goes to.

05.02.2013 18:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20735

Moved.

05.02.2013 18:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20738

Goes to.

05.02.2013 15:58, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #20718

Evgeny, I put photos of all Junonia caught on there. I feel one of them is Coenia.

05.02.2013 14:06, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #12493

Moved to P. agleoides "uncertain".

05.02.2013 14:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20598

Moved to vulgaris.

05.02.2013 14:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13685

Aha. Updated.

05.02.2013 3:19, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #3580

Why so? See http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30160010.html http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30150010.html Look at the discal spot, which is a diagnostic feature. The rest features suit as well.