Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553... 627

12.07.2012 22:01, vasiliy-feoktistov: comment on Dendrolimnus. D. sibiricus, D.pini

However, this is the Genus Dendrolimus (Germar, 1812)Alexandr88, please rename the topic name and edit the title post: correct spelling of the title is a serious thing!And after that: there is no such species as Dendrolimus sibiricus, but there is a subspecies of silkworm Dendrolimus superans (Butler, 1877) ssp. sibiricus Tschetverikov, 1908.This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 12.07.2012 ...

12.07.2012 17:19, Alexey Semchenko: comment on photo #9952

Recent days I saw such one about 10—11 in the evening in Moscow region, Solnechnogorsky district, Andreevka village. It was flying over phloxes.

11.07.2012 17:01, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #11876

Rather ochroid and creamy as the pages of your website.

10.07.2012 19:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13617

Moved.

10.07.2012 18:19, Euchloron: comment on Who knows what kind of dipters suck the "blood" of caterpillars?

A number of species of woodlice (Ceratopogonidae) from the genera Atrichopogon and Forcipomyia (maybe some others) feed on the hemolymph of soft-coated insects. Your animal is just one of the ceratopogonids, but you can't tell from the photo.Thank you very much!

10.07.2012 16:28, Lev Bely: comment on The world's smallest moth at Bohart Museum of Entomology, California, USA

Supposedly, the smallest moth in the world is now at Bohart Museum of Entomology, University of California, Davis. The other day senior museum scientist Steve Heydon was sorting insects collected during his expedition to the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2006, and he suddenly spotted a tiny moth of about 1mm length just as the dot size at the end of this paragraph. Heydon says that this ...

09.07.2012 23:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13683

Now to "identified successfully".

09.07.2012 17:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13653

Thanks for the correction, goes to Brenthis ino ward.

09.07.2012 0:17, Peter Khramov: comment on Catalogue search by random taxon

Now you may search species in the Catalogue by families and any other taxon as well, beginning from genus and higher. In case if you choose both family and random taxon using auto-suggestions, the latter will be preferred as to the search results, whilst family ignored. Hooray! Now Satyrinae that systematized on the website as a subfamily, can be chosen separately from Nymphalidae family. Now ...

07.07.2012 10:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13624

Moved to lathonia.

07.07.2012 10:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13620

Goes to E. glyphica.

07.07.2012 10:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13618

Moved.

07.07.2012 10:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13619

Whee, one more.

07.07.2012 10:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13621

Goes to.

07.07.2012 10:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13622

Moved to L. dispar.

06.07.2012 22:52, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13681

Yes, there it is: http://lepidoptera.pro/catalog?regs[]=40&page=2&tax[]=106&photo=on. Moved it.

06.07.2012 22:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13547

Yes, didn't move it promptly. Move it to C. culmella as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13562.

06.07.2012 21:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13648

Straight hare.

05.07.2012 23:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13573

Goes to I. aversata.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13595

Moved as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13598

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13599

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13597

I've just moved all four, it would be great though to make it possible to identify all at once if it's such a group. However, soon there will be a feature connecting photos of one species.

05.07.2012 18:19, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13603

This species is identified correctly.

05.07.2012 1:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13579

Did they multiply!

05.07.2012 1:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13566

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13604

Goes to Colostygia pectinataria.

04.07.2012 23:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13607

Moved to Colostygia pectinataria.

04.07.2012 23:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13562

Goes to.

04.07.2012 23:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13548

Yes, Vitaly happens to make mistakes at times. Moved the second one to "uncertain" as well...

04.07.2012 23:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13554

Yes, this is the same specimen, or even species. I play with angles after the main ones are done :--)

04.07.2012 23:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13552

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13569

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13572

Goes to.

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13611

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13578

Moved out of "undetermined".

04.07.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13608

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13600

Ok, move it to "identified successfully".

03.07.2012 12:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6177

Moved to "undetermined".

03.07.2012 11:01, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg: comment on Big khrushchak crawled in

Standard tip: Check your food inventory. There is a forgotten bag of cereals/dried fruits somewhere, and there zoophobas breed. They can also fly in/crawl in from the outside.

02.07.2012 22:20, Lev Bely: comment on Diamondback moths are sterilized to reduce crop loss

The British company Oxitec “updated” diamondback moths (Plutella xylostella) by sterilizing males to reduce crop loss. Oxitec researchers made genetically modified sterile males which are to mate with non-laboratory, “wild” females of the same species. Due to this modification, females of the next brood don't survive to adult stage. The company press-release reads that this is just ...