Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48... 51

27.02.2011 21:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #1025

Kidding???

27.02.2011 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5978

Mistake. This one is Papilio heringi, Niepelt, 1924, from Halmahera island.

27.02.2011 13:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5819

Looked through many pictures and can say that see no difference between these two species because they vary so much.

27.02.2011 3:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5819

Is it possible to look at the underside? Seems to be Agrias aedon.

26.02.2011 13:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6274

Pyralidae.

26.02.2011 13:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6275

Pyralidae.

24.02.2011 20:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #2877

Noo! Helena can be only in Philippines. Means, 100% Troides rhadamantus, female.

24.02.2011 18:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #2877

This one is not Troides helena!!! Most probably TROIDES RHADAMANTUS female.

23.02.2011 2:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5978

Mistake. This one is Papilio heringi, Niepelt, 1924, from Halmahera island.

21.02.2011 23:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Issoria eugenia

Not Issoria eugenia, and Kuekenthaliella eugenia (Eversmann, 1847)

21.02.2011 23:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6374

Male.

20.02.2011 18:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Protesilaus protesilaus

I like it more http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com Opler & Warren, 2003 Butterflies of North America. Scott, James A., 1986; The Butterflies of North America

20.02.2011 17:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Protesilaus protesilaus

Eurytides, Protesilaus, Mimoides will integrate better into the genus Eurytides

20.02.2011 16:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Protesilaus protesilaus

remove this family

19.02.2011 23:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6202

Glaucostola guttipalpis (Walker, 1856)???

19.02.2011 23:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6202

Rhipha albiplaga ???

19.02.2011 23:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6243

Trichromia.

19.02.2011 19:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6219

Leuciris fimbriaria.

19.02.2011 16:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #2806

This is male.

19.02.2011 1:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5930

But Iqvitos should be changed to Iquitos.

19.02.2011 1:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5930

This species is identified correctly.

18.02.2011 22:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4394

No versions but Colias myrmidone.

18.02.2011 19:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5883

Meant M. jurtina.

18.02.2011 19:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5883

This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2011 0:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5515

The species is added to the database/approved.

14.02.2011 22:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5504

The species is added to the database/approved.

14.02.2011 21:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Papilio gambrisius

I can not put nothing Cramer, [1777] in the authors !!! Only here faced with this, although normally synonymous dobavils

14.02.2011 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5080

This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 0:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5055

This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 0:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5030

This species is identified correctly.

13.02.2011 23:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5059

Looked through this genus also. Diaphania nitidalis (Stoll, 1781) varies mostly and most similar to.

13.02.2011 23:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5059

Genus is right 100% sure.

13.02.2011 23:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5067

Pyrochlora rhanis???

13.02.2011 23:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5495

Mocis dyndima ???

13.02.2011 23:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5046

This species is identified correctly.

13.02.2011 23:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5057

Maybe, genus is right, but species looks different: http://www.inbio.ac.cr/diquis/index.php?option=com_joomgallery&func=detail&id=444&Itemid=6#joomimg.

13.02.2011 23:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5057

Rod may be correct, but does not look like the form = http://www.inbio.ac.cr/diquis/index.php?option=com_joomgallery&func=detail&id=444&Itemid=6#joomimg

13.02.2011 22:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5504

Same species on both pictures.

13.02.2011 19:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5504

Checked out my Castniidae and realized that we wrongly identified this one!!! It's Telchin licus (Drury, 1773).