Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49... 51

08.02.2011 23:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5519

Argynnis pandora.

08.02.2011 23:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5523

Chazara enervata.

08.02.2011 23:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3457

As for me personally, I also tend to sylvestris, since the antennae are ginger. Just thought you may know few more differences.

08.02.2011 22:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Ochlodes venatus

Note to the form Ochlodes venata (removed from the base of 09.11.2013 14:26): on all but Photo # 3457 - there Thymelicus sp.

08.02.2011 22:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3457

"08-02-2011, Evgeny Karolinsky: This one is Th. sylvestris!" Why not Thymelicus lineola? Though can't see clearly stigma and the antennae, if they're ginger or black. Anyway that is Thymelicus genus 100% sure.

08.02.2011 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Ochlodes venatus

Note to the form Ochlodes venata (removed from the base of 09.11.2013 14:26): Absolutely !!! On all photo Ochlodes sylvanus (Esper, [1778]) have to endure

08.02.2011 21:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5507

This one is done, surprisedly and happily.

08.02.2011 21:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5489

Let's check out Sphingidae, who is not lazy volunteer?

08.02.2011 20:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5072

And this one.

08.02.2011 20:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4994

And this one.

08.02.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4981

And this one, please.

08.02.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5022

Move this one, please.

08.02.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5017

Perola villosipes.

08.02.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5018

Perola villosipes.

08.02.2011 20:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5052

Acraga infusa "uncertain".

08.02.2011 20:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5052

Acraga infusa "uncertain".

08.02.2011 20:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5510

Thus I can identify every thing there....... to the order.

08.02.2011 19:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4606

If it's needed to approve already identified successfully ones?

08.02.2011 17:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5494

If this is Saturnia (not sure though), then rather Periga genus. Lonomia is what famous of its poisonous caterpillars???

08.02.2011 17:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5496

Genus and species added.

08.02.2011 17:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5510

May be even Heliconidae. Though there everything is put to Nymphalidae.

08.02.2011 15:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5020

That's it: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_imago.htm.

08.02.2011 15:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5019

Limacodidae Perola villosipes, (Walker, 1865), female.

08.02.2011 15:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5020

Limacodidae Perola villosipes, (Walker, 1865), female.

08.02.2011 2:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5006

This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 2:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5006

Semaeopus subtincta, Warren, 1897.

08.02.2011 1:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5508

Agyrta auxo (Linnaeus, 1767), finally.

08.02.2011 1:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5508

No!! micilia is rather different.

08.02.2011 1:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5508

What a world! All crew is identifying not butterfly but the very author!

08.02.2011 1:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5502

And this one is Dysschema tricolor. Approving, please???

08.02.2011 1:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5496

Think, Xylophanes titana.

08.02.2011 1:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5489

Manduca vestalis???

08.02.2011 1:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5508

Hey, I've got it, but what about author???

08.02.2011 1:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5508

Found author here: http://www.passions-papillons.com/Arctiidae/arctiidaeguyct.html#auxo.

08.02.2011 1:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5508

Yes, looks very similar to! Even red hatted. Author is Linnaeus, 1767, though.

08.02.2011 1:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5507

Whoa! Agreed!

08.02.2011 1:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5507

Rather Aethria leucaspis (Cramer, 1775). At least, genus is sure.

08.02.2011 0:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5507

If I only knew where to find these books...

08.02.2011 0:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5507

Who wants and is not lazy, can look through: http://www.flickr.com/photos/33398884@N03/4338530161/in/set-72157623249991359/.

08.02.2011 0:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5483

That was not grease! That was aid to Cuba hard-working guys! Whatever, 1€ can't be a grease.

08.02.2011 0:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5482

Hey, why that is pulled down, huh??? The more, these two belong to different groups!!! There are two different genera, Morpho helenor (Cramer, 1776) and Morpho achilles (Linnaeus, 1758).

08.02.2011 0:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5509

The right one is something of Oleria genus.

08.02.2011 0:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5510

Meh, afraid even good connection won't help. Tough case.

07.02.2011 23:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5510

Why not Mechanitis or Forbestra genera, or something else of Ithomia??

07.02.2011 23:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5503

•Philaethria!!! Added genus and species. Check it!!!!

07.02.2011 23:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #5483

Genus and species added. By the way, I was nearly arrested in Cuba cause of this one, not because of trying to catch it but crossing some private lands. 1€ saved my soul!