Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346... 497
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Yes, I was reinsured :) Though confident in her with very high probability.
Yes, and there is exactly the same form it: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_1_5.php
Fast forward a minute I had her in the exact :)
If the United States then it is likely not Parnassius phoebus, andParnassius smintheusssp. sternitzkyi McDunnough, 1936 (he just has such a subspecies) :)
But to Parnassus'm cold and it could be wrong. Wanted more opinions :)
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Type of extremely volatile so only inaccurate .....
http://www.papua-insects.nl/insect%20orders/Lepidoptera/Euteliidae/Stictopterinae/Stictoptera/Stictoptera%20cucullioides.htm
Lophoptera lineigera?
Corrected data. Not identified → Dalima mjoebergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Chances are overlooked when species did. Already, he can not remember to be honest (
Probably really makes the Avatha noctuoides Guenee, 1852 , but it turned out like this (((
Pogadaev little bit :) It could be formed, and when I did sort of: he, too, called Avatha Walker, 1858 that is, the same author and the same year :)
I apologize for this blunder :) And please correct species name on ...
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15691 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15687 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15711 group.
Geography then confused :)
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hesudra divisa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hesudra divisa / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Neophasia menapia / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Just in case:
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/serrodes/serrodes_2_8.php
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/15_EREBINAE/019_Avatha/Avatha%20tepescens/Avatha%20tepescens.htm
Corrected data. Bracca georgiata → Bracca maculosa.
Corrected data. Bracca georgiata → Bracca maculosa.
Corrected data. Not identified → Smerinthus planus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Ethiopic, Indo-Malayan, Australian.
In my backTrichosea mjobergi: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/05_NOCTUIDAE/06_PANTHEINAE/03_Trichosea/Trichosea%20mjobergi/Trichosea%20mjobergi.htm
More like no one there does not come to mind as he wrote yesterday: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30052
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
I will make a timid suggestion :)Trichosea mjobergi?
Based on the fact that the moths of borneo is given one species of the genus: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/pantheinae/gallery.php
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
I got confused with them. One male turned out to be "incomplete" (without the underside), and dates do not understand. They are all different (
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #25499 group.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15681 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15679 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15684 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15677 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #15664 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #35400 group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Next page