Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384... 497
Corrected data. Not identified → Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Apotomis betuletana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Apotomis betuletana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
She does not see the options.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.
She slumber just eats :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / .
Corrected data. Not identified → Anarta trifolii / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Gypsonoma dealbana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
This species is identified correctly.
dealbana of habit. I stand.
Do not delete. It was a double best picture and I changed it. The point is that when the goods have not yet had the opportunity to replace :)
del.
Alexander, a small question. You are in the background that you use? For a long time I want to go to a black background, but I can not find the optimal solution. A plan to replace, complete and ahead of winter, when there is time to do it.
Corrected data.
As a postscript: I understand of course that can be useful to determine the type, for example, in the field (where the Internet is not always and not at all). But why in such quantities. I think that they have already played a role in determining a particular butterfly and should remove excess, leaving one photo. Of course, if Andrew will not mind :)
Gentlemen, do you think these photos are needed and even more so in such numbers? Here is an example photo of the genitals: lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32916 What are want to see on the site. Or is it for the story? :)
Corrected data.
Corrected data.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Not identified → Thymelicus sylvestris / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.
Corrected data. Not identified → Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.
Shamil large compared with the average copper-butterfly? Also from the phone (.....
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Forced the process. Congrats with a new species, guys :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.
Corrected data. Not identified → Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.
Corrected data. Not identified → Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.
Corrected data. Not identified → Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.
Announcement. The species is IDed. I'll add this day after tomorrow, not databased. And will move :)
I have only 2 days with phone and I can not check. If anyone confirm-bear :)
Alexei underside there hour? Although this probably can be determined foreshortening. Sam can not do it until the next day, I think, yes, Aglaia or Adippa, but rather the first one. It is necessary that somebody else checked.
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
This one goes to tentatively identified based on another collected day ago which was as well questionable with such angle even less worn-out :) Alexandr's right, no chance to get clear ID here.
Photos are not grouped and moved according to the author's remark.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Could be this. However, I see it as miniata male. I upped this a week ago without moving. Yesterday I did where thought reasonable. Miniata can be pale as well. If I was wrong, please move where you think it should be. Would be great though to get some reaction to my 19:18 27/08/2014 request. No offense :)
Didn't have time.... Seems got it for the first time here :)
Thanks. Moving to confidently identified :)
Alexandr, here's it. Just I accelerated the drying process :) Have no idea now... Anticipating puthami.
Already spread, I'll add when it's done :) Usually putnami goes to the light whilst this one looks kinda different. Or just some illusion, dunno. Will see when gets spread :)
Sure :) No any removing.
Curious. Seems Lampronia though no any Prodoxidae in 40th region according to Synev...
Here's male: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27329 which Irina IDed, no wings and abdomen seen though... Meh..... would be great to spread it. Dreams, dreams........
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (13.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 17:48, P. Khramov: In some cases, sorting/ordering in ...
- 17:43, P. Khramov: Comments that concerned incorrect p...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Streets: insects names
- Butterflies and music: Celtic Woman
