Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386... 497
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Here I also quit. The explanation below.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lymantria mathura / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Eupithecia pusillata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Not identified → Eupithecia pusillata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Not identified → Timandra paralias / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Well let keep it there then (yesterday checked). Seems time to get to Far East ones, no chance to escape :)
Lost in these ( Any chance to identify?
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 25—33 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → July, August.
Turns out Anacampsis blattariella. Alexandr, your thoughts?
Corrected data. Not identified → Grapholita delineana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Two same opinions + mine third :) Moving.
I see Timandra paralias it is: it has thicker purple line against dichela, yet can't decide to move it surely.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.
Pardon me, I meant Pandemis.
Archips sp.
Yury, what they're resting on? Archips sp. and imago distinctly reminds some of our locals :)
Tentatively identified due to no underside.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lycaena phlaeas / Tentatively identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
So what to do with this one? There are 4 species, Lymantria dispar and Lymantria monacha are most known :) Grisescens clearly doesn't pass... Finally got matura, typical thorax pattern, I gave the link over a month ago... Swore not to ID any from Far East, so that's the question :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Boloria selene / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.
I've got two species at the moment one of which http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32829 (supposedly oculea male) will be examined. Only mine are from Vladimir region, doesn't matter anyway.
No chance for this one to be examined :) Alexandr, decide where to move it. I preferred withdrawal. Still feel this is not oculea :)
I just do not know where to put it, Alexander. But there is clearly no oculea; fucosa , or lucens is. A fourth kind of Amphipoea crinanensis (Burrows, 1908) like as there is in the Ministry of Defense is only theoretically and then in the south of the region, and Lotoshinsky area where this shot is on the north-west of Moscow region. Here's about to flourish, you know .....
The top photo should be removed: it is certainly not it. Already suffered in uncertain .....
Corrected data. Amphipoea oculea / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Not identified.
Petr please remove this one, definitely not oculea. I totally failed back then. Withdrawing (
Young larva. Here's another alike: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/15515
Corrected data. Not identified → Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Now it's +13 degrees Celcius outside and some still fly around :)
Corrected data.
Corrected data.
Corrected data.
Can't agree on this. Rather Spilosoma punctarium, definitely not niveum.
Just can be wrongly moved... I changed :)
Here also I think A. oculea. First to compare its shape, colour and spot pattern to mine: one species as I see. Completely agree with that prof Irina referred to in the very beginning :)
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Alexandr Zhakov.
This one could be Amphipoea lucens, 50/50 probability. Sure just my humble opinion :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Diarsia rubi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Agree: as well see rather rubi... Moving.
Yeah, I got your steps :) Just forgot to add "too" between "confidently" and "imho", here's my comment confusing :)
Species level. Pay attention to the shape of its hindwings (oculea has much more "round"), also that one is itself more round :) And its "eye" spot........ As for this one, no sense to examine genitalia as it's female. Tomorrow if the weather's good I'll have a night out there to collect some more "oculea" (supposedly) :)
Hope this is the last step...
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
News
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
New photos (25.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 11:40, N. Grebennikov: По такому фото невозможно определит...
- 22:47, V. Kolesnikov: Похожа на Orthetrum cancellatum (по...
- 22:21, P. Khramov: Ранее раздел Поиск энтомологов толь...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Neither fish nor flesh, or what butterflies actually prefer
