Pages: 1 ...382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390... 497
There are 3 (40): all the geese are on the site and the remaining 2 are not suitable. Just did not carry myself because things never with color brushes did not come across: All white or yellow with us :)
Well, so what came :) Generally today Pts. bad we fly (due to cold nights, apparently). Sam then zadubela three sheets: a fire had already bred :)
So for this site there is a jackdaw "view inaccurately defined" (in vague can not clean). Well, then time will tell: the good have something to dance :)
Well, I personally know the owner of the site where the link resulted in a long time, and to cooperate with him (on beetles, true) .... So I have a reason to trust its definition. And so, yes genitals, certainly. Well, that is assembled male, by the way. It is useful, but only for verification :)
In 3 of the four types of Amphipoea specified for 8 spravochka: Amphipoea oculea: http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1363-amphipoea-oculea Amphipoea fucosa : http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1361-amphipoea-fucosa Amphipoea lucens : http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1362-amphipoea-lucens How is this habit, they are not defined? It is clearly visible differences. ...
Join the song :) Yuri, append the name of the subspecies in the form: Cuculia pustulata ssp. fraterna (Butler, 1878) And do not write the name of the subspecies as a species. The other day was loaded here this butterfly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32756 as an independent Antheraea oculea and accordingly fell to moderation and had to smash his head a bit. Here are just now "dot the i" ...
If you follow the lines, already stated in the commentary to Yuri http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5796 then I agree and stand.
Well, ifCatocala orientalisregion it is necessary to add Sinev. Novocherkassk is a 11 if I'm not mistaken? Refer it to the neighboring, and apparently this is the twelfth "edge" species distribution in the west.
That this male is not so tattered, by the way: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32532 Previous yes, tattered: but arrived early. Alexander, by the way about pronubu remind you that you promised to put there. I unfortunately only 4 copies. I come, although a candle every night. But we have a lot of it does not happen, and I doubt that her MO of someone else lay out this year (God forbid, that was ...
Yes, I might add. Alexander, is there is at least one photo where you can see the expanded and lower kpylya? Appear: means can be removed: A. Zhakov did not like it .....
It is not from the balcony, and more than a hundred kilometers. from this balcony (read geography). I wonder what-if fed mosquitoes in swamps Meshchera all night? And I do not know, will there be more to catch the light (this year, at least).
Well now you can cook in the future :) And we have to fly (in the region of 8), at this time should theoretically all four species given for the region: the task is the more (
And the other is not, I said. And if you cook genitalia: without any belly will appear :) Or not? In general, they do not need to put and remove photos in nature at all? Because obviously undetectable?
Yes, I gathered only one "to the point" :) habit she just oculea to fit most. And so, yes, I watch out: maybe ask someone to cook (in combination with the rest of the family, coordinate and put for this reason).
I put in inaccurate since it indicates the time for the flight of Region 8 May - July. Already the end of August, and I have collected a series of last night ..... Maybe it's the other one?
Something I do not understand: he pretended here today: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Automerina.htm where it goes quite a valid view, but not synonymous at Automerula auletes (Herrich-Schäffer, [1854 ]) : http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/65424? And this German and very authoritative source kind of Automerula Michener, 1949 is totally absent: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/inhalt.htm Can anyone ...
Instead of Antheraea polyphemus Cramer, 1775 is the hour? More precisely subspecies her Antheraea polyphemus oculea Neumoegen, 1883 : http://eol.org/pages/29511961/overview Something as a separate oculea not find anywhere else ...
It is necessary, of course. If sushestvuet field on the page, it means that they have to fill. Although it is a butterfly :)
Corrected data. Not identified / 0000-00-00 00:00:00 → Taenaris schoenbergi / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus / 2010-07-00 00:00:00.