Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396... 497
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Alexandr Zhakov → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Vlad Proklov → Andrey Ponomarev.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Then, when the gallery will be parasites. And um, you see, and they define :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Gelechia jakovlevi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Gelechia jakovlevi / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Spilonota ocellana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Spilonota ocellana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Gelechia rhombelliformis ?
Corrected data. Not identified → Celypha rivulana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Celypha rivulana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
It's more like Notocelia roborana. We'll wait for other opinions.
Corrected data. Not identified → Spilonota ocellana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
This species is identified correctly.
Well house and helped all "dotting the i's" right :)
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Pupa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Pupa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Certainly the form :) This and guidance. Just here is a comment from Alexander 02.19.2014 21:31 so I decided here otkommentit to understand was what was happening :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Well, yes, it is. I stand.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
:) How long have "plagued" My: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=362944&view=findpost&p=1233729 :) Therefore, "to avoid stepping on a rake" ..... From personal experience, so to speak.
AUT question, thanks to Irina. Product Sinev for 6 years from the date of publication had become outdated in some places. I propose to move a photo here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/89496 Reason: VV Website Dubatolov, which is updated constantly: http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/images/Lemyra_jankowskii.htm That same applies to the neighboring species Thyrgorina boghaika (Tshistjakov & Kishida, ...
Their point of view explained in the comments to the photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32265 From this it is inaccurate.
Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Amelora fucosa → Amphipoea fucosa.
Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Amelora fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Suitable, but only inaccurate: the species has a certain resemblance to theAmphipoea oculeaAnd both of them are variable and the issue here, as far as I know, "genital"
Well, here sheSpilosoma luteafigures and Spilarctia lutea in her synonyms worth. We must will explain this issue. Yuri, you have to add a subspecies of the form: Spilosoma lutea ssp. japonica (Rothschild, 1910) and then I think you can carry in inaccurate, "the place" :)
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Isn't it an Abrostola triplasia by any chance? As the photographer has claimed it.
:)
Petr, confidently. The species is very distinctive one (see the link below).
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lemyra jankowskii / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Yeah, it looks exactly like the speciman at the picture from szmn.sbras.ru. I move it to the L. jankowskii.
I doubt about it. I marked "tentatively identified" as yet.
This one is certainly Lemyra jankowskii (see http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/images/Lemyra_jankowskii.htm) But I'll wait other users' opinions before moving it. And I challenge that that photo's http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32025 identification is not correct. Yuri, can't you say what was the abdomen's color?
Corrected data. Not identified → Catocala nupta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Catocala nupta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Eulithis prunata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (14.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 17:48, P. Khramov: In some cases, sorting/ordering in ...
- 17:43, P. Khramov: Comments that concerned incorrect p...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- World versus The Moth: part 5. Housework.
