Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404... 497
Corrected data. Not identified → Apatura metis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Acrobasis tumidana / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.
Corrected data. Not identified → Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xanthorhoe fluctuata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.
Corrected data. Not identified → Philereme transversata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.
Andrew took the goose is not deducing?
By doing this butterfly genus and nakosyachil: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120522 Peter, we need to understand, and then I kind of vobyu and bear it.
AUT question four months ago ........
I did not dare to exact savit immediately. I want to ask to check the definition. The copper-butterfly my knowledge close to zero :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Not identified → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Scopula nigropunctata / Andrei Komrakov → Scopula immutata / Basil Sergienko.
Shamil, because began to spread like? We strongly recommend to gather a collection. And then the underside will be on hand always :) And if so advice is always help for "those. Part" as a man with a fair experience :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Eilema depressa / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Autographa pulchrina / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Autographa pulchrina / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.
That is to accurately determine the underside pirgusov very desirable in my opinion :) Have?
Corrected data. Not identified → Nymphalis canace / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Eupithecia subfuscata / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.
Corrected data. Not identified → Scopula immutata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Argynnis niobe / Simon Coombes → Argynnis adippe / Alexsandr Martukov.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.
In fact, everything is simple: type in a search engine site the genus Neptis, and then look for the species. Find the right, open it and download from a page type your photo and then it will fall right. A determinant, yes, ochepyatka, however :)
Yuri, spelled correctly tschetverikovi. Because of the missing letter "C" in writing the specific name and photo were for moderation.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified / Mihail Nyzhnikov → Not identified.
Do not write anything at startup if the type is undefined.
I repeat: do not write anything in the "Specification of the classification of" not related to the subject line (the species name was not applicable). The definition is written in the form of a comment.
Corrected data. Not identified → Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.
Corrected data. Svetlana Shchavelina → Vasiliy Feoktistov.
:)
This is when transferring a piece of geography that goes up quotes. And the very fact that since the quotes have to restore later. Do not gud (
Corrected data. Not identified → Dindica alaopis / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Not identified → Pasiphila rectangulata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.
It is not necessary to write sexual identity in the "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age" as it does not relate to the subject field. Just a comment to a photo. Why once again to move the moderators to edit this field? Honestly it's too much :)
The view of my personal observations, of which became very rare in the usual Moscow and the border areas: its very intensively replace us in recent years, coming from the southHyponephele lycaon, we becoming so massive that "oxen eye" on his background and is not visible almost .... Everything changes, time goes ...
I decided to straighten one for clarity ...
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (14.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 17:48, P. Khramov: In some cases, sorting/ordering in ...
- 17:43, P. Khramov: Comments that concerned incorrect p...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Entomology job and education: tropical greenhouse, New Zealand forests and Université de Lausanne grants
