Pages: 1 ...67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75... 497
The Russian understanding Erotylidae is "Fungi" and they stand in Cucujoidea. A Mycetophagidae this "caveman" and they stand in Tenebrionoidea. Quite different beetles. Both families are represented in Russia Somehow, "here is a pair of shoes" :)
Corrected data. Anthriboscyla mima Thomson, 1868, Coptops lecideosa Pascoe, 1865, Agelasta lecideosa Pascoe, 1865 were removed from the synonyms list
Corrected data. Anthriboscyla mima Thomson, 1868, Coptops lecideosa Pascoe, 1865, Agelasta lecideosa Pascoe, 1865 were removed from the synonyms list
Corrected data. Anthriboscyla mima Thomson, 1868, Coptops lecideosa Pascoe, 1865 were removed from the synonyms list
I messed up here in my opinion. Encaustini Crotch, 1876 is a kind of tribe standing in the subfamily Erotylinae: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id309497/ Activities It is necessary then.
How else would deal with these comrades? In my case, too - joints ...... There unspecified number. species, but where and how to identify them I have no idea (
May be. Or maybe not..... At most like this or this http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/53758 37 pieces in the collection is uncertain of Peninsular Malaysia. I do not know which side to approach them ( Ruteliny tropical, you know .......
Not barbel. It lozhnoslonik. In general, it is interesting) In Asia, there are species that are under long-horned beetles mow quite successfully :)
No, you give me such Dmitry did not send. It is only at Eugene. Eugene, still you need to be contacted with the spices, about which you wrote. I'm afraid that without this in any way here.
Where indicated? In the sense that all of these instructions there the kinds of matter rather dubious, considering that in the present subgenus 2 double at least. Here it is necessary spices to barbel Borneo show clearly :)
Almost sure Glenea cantor obesa var. vitticollis Breuning, 1958: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id1155117/ (where, in similar types listed Glenea grossepunctata , which thought in the beginning). While I can not stand: still need opinions)
Eugene, I think felt something :) Look, please: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=15494 There, the truth from the peninsula, but by habit we can say that one in one. A general answer is simple here: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=15011 Generally, these are more things Glenn ......
Corrected data. Thyestes funebris Gahan, 1888, Thyestes pubescens Thomson, 1864, Saperda gebleri Faldermann, 1835, Thyestilla lepesmei Gilmour, 1950, Thyestilla gebleri kadowakii Fujimura, 1962, Phytœcia curtipennis Pic, 1952 were removed from the synonyms list
Corrected data. Thyestes funebris Gahan, 1888, Thyestes pubescens Thomson, 1864, Saperda gebleri Faldermann, 1835, Thyestilla lepesmei Gilmour, 1950, Thyestilla gebleri kadowakii Fujimura, 1962, Phytœcia curtipennis Pic, 1952 were removed from the synonyms list
Corrected data. Thyestes funebris Gahan, 1888, Thyestes pubescens Thomson, 1864, Saperda gebleri Faldermann, 1835, Thyestilla lepesmei Gilmour, 1950, Thyestilla gebleri kadowakii Fujimura, 1962 were removed from the synonyms list
Corrected data. Thyestes funebris Gahan, 1888, Thyestes pubescens Thomson, 1864, Saperda gebleri Faldermann, 1835, Thyestilla lepesmei Gilmour, 1950 were removed from the synonyms list
Corrected data. Thyestes funebris Gahan, 1888, Thyestes pubescens Thomson, 1864, Saperda gebleri Faldermann, 1835 were removed from the synonyms list
Corrected data. Thyestes funebris Gahan, 1888, Thyestes pubescens Thomson, 1864 were removed from the synonyms list