Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1
This species is identified correctly.
Shamil, sadly no any. Was quick to fly off.(
Lasiommata maera?
This species is identified correctly.
Petr, thanks! I see the website is progressing and improving! what's great! I just used to have daily discussions on birds.kz, and here instead few day breaks occur when nothing happens. :) Sure, each has its own specifics, and butterflies require meticulousness and diligence.
Good day! So I read it through and want to say something too. I'm not a professional biologist nor even a collector of butterflies or flowers, just an ordinary amateur photographer and thus I'm interested much more in the story of my pic and its value as well as that very butterfly or moth I shot. Erst I was curious too about why discussions were brief if ever happened, usually just one phrase ...
Why not Polyommatus icarus female? http://www.butterflies-moths-turkey.com/polyommatus-icarus-cokgozlu-mavi,193.html.
To Alexandr. ...so they're identified by taste! :)
Petr, please delete this. Double!
Likely to be!
Female, second generation.
Moths clover, a lattice Moth
And you can clarify what still distinguished these subspecies - habitat or they can be distinguished visually?
Sorry, missed the location, this is East Kazakhstan, Western Altai, Ust-Kamenogorsk.
Polyommatus icarus? East Kazakhstan, Ust-Kamenogorsk.
Eumedonia eumedon?
Looks very close though I read there are several similar species relative to the subgenus Mellicta.
Remove!
Rhymnaria eckweileri (Lukhtanov, 1993), ID is approved by S. Toropov, Bishkek.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.