Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1

11.12.2024 6:44, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99444

Sympetrum vulgatum

09.12.2024 13:03, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99418

Thanks! I added another picture of my underwear. Maybe it will be clearer to see

05.12.2024 20:42, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99301

Euphydryas maturna Determined by Pavel Gorbunov

29.11.2024 21:14, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99174

Unfortunately, I can't correct anything - in the edit window, this cell is empty and inactive.

28.11.2024 21:45, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99168

Melitaea phoebe

27.11.2024 15:02, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99133

Added one. there are no others(

27.11.2024 13:48, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99122

"What should I do if I don't know exactly the specific name of a taxon (which is 90% ), but only the family or genus? How do I upload them and ask someone to identify them every time? And how can I further intervene in the process? Or still write an inaccurate name and then wait for your reaction." Specify the definition of the level that you think is correct (squad/family/clan) for the snapshot, ...

27.11.2024 9:15, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99122

Peter, thank you for the heartfelt conversation and some details of your "kitchen"! I had a rough idea of everything, and believe me, I appreciate your hard work in preserving and developing the site in these difficult times.) Unlike you, I dreamed of being a biologist as a child, but it didn't work out and I ended up becoming an architect. And I've always had my camera with me, from first grade ...

26.11.2024 21:38, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99122

Thanks for the explanation. I realized two things. Since it is impossible to accurately identify approximately 80% of species from photos, it turns out that only professional (or experienced amateurs) people who are already initially confident in the taxon can upload photos to the site, and then sort them out in their environment. It turns out that photographers and just nature lovers seem to ...

26.11.2024 19:38, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99122

There was a suggestion on Tentyria nomas on inaturalist?

26.11.2024 16:35, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99122

Sorry, I haven't visited the site for a long time. Much has been forgotten. If someone suggested a definition, then what actions should I take next? Then wait for something else opinions or or the moderator should move somewhere?

24.11.2024 22:47, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #99094

Similar to Orthetrum cancellatum (according to other photos on the site)

23.06.2019 5:36, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #76343

This species is identified correctly.

30.06.2014 6:08, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #31069

Shamil, sadly no any. Was quick to fly off.(

12.06.2013 17:37, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #22344

Lasiommata maera?

03.06.2013 13:44, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #22281

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2013 10:26, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #16644

Petr, thanks! I see the website is progressing and improving! what's great! I just used to have daily discussions on birds.kz, and here instead few day breaks occur when nothing happens. :) Sure, each has its own specifics, and butterflies require meticulousness and diligence.

28.01.2013 11:40, Viktor Kolesnikov: comment on photo #16644

Good day! So I read it through and want to say something too. I'm not a professional biologist nor even a collector of butterflies or flowers, just an ordinary amateur photographer and thus I'm interested much more in the story of my pic and its value as well as that very butterfly or moth I shot. Erst I was curious too about why discussions were brief if ever happened, usually just one phrase ...