Photo #11250: Plusia festucae

15.02.2014 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov

Yes, that means that a good number 1039, it made a mistake in 1049, here in 1139 again made a mistake :)

15.02.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Once this is Timothy cease all run up? :)

15.02.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Timothy xeIslYKIvPWtJFxOtTr → Eddy Verfaillie.

15.02.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Plusia putnami / Vlad Proklov → Plusia festucae / Timothy xeIslYKIvPWtJFxOtTr.

15.02.2014 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Four opinions (including mine) are the same and it willy-nilly, says for the transfer. Frankly embarrassed that defined Vlad, whose definition is almost always does not cause problems. I stand still ....

15.02.2014 21:07, Sergei Kotov

Anyone can make mistakes, including Vlad Proklov. I also think that at this photo Plusia festucae. Look at the forum molbiol.ru the topic "Defining butterflies" message URL # 16710 (335 page). There Oleg Baking (barko) demonstrated how you can easily determine the types Plusia festucae / putnami appearance.

15.02.2014 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov

Vasily, do not rush to carry, for me it's really festucae, ask again Vlad. this butterfly among putnami not look :)

15.02.2014 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Plusia festucae / Eddy Verfaillie → Plusia putnami / Vlad Proklov.

15.02.2014 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Sorry, actually, Vlad rights. It putnami. Something I'm overworked and head cooks is not :)

15.02.2014 17:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Andrew, you are the same to me this document and sent a year ago :)

15.02.2014 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Plusia putnami / Andrey Ponomarev → Plusia festucae / Eddy Verfaillie.

15.02.2014 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yes, it, I drag to festucae. If you have questions: I send to e-mail a document with the bases :)

04.02.2014 19:49, Eddy Verfaillie

I think this is festucae.