Photo #25379: Gynautocera papilionaria

10.12.2013 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

→ Gynautocera papilionaria.

10.12.2013 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Accorded to http://www.nhm.ac.uk Gynautocera papilionaria Guérin-Meneville, 1831 is actual. Added the species and the gender then. Moving :)

28.11.2013 20:58, Irina Nikulina

Alexandr, right, I noticed that mess as well, thought I didn't get something right) Though Guérin-Meneville, 1831 is more frequent as to this species) http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/search/detail.dsml?TaxonNo=82977.0
http://www.lba.uk.com/Zyganenidae-Gynautocera-Papilionaria-THAILAND_AO4CQ.aspx. You might have seen that already..

28.11.2013 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov

So unclear there, didn't find the author of the gender but in Wikipedia :))) Gynautocera Guérin-Méneville, 1831, even two options, papilionaria Guérin-Meneville, 1831 and papilionaria Guerin, 1830, can't reference the gender to Wikipedia at any rate :)

28.11.2013 19:35, Irina Nikulina

Vasily, this gender seems to be disguised by Prosopandrophila Hering, 1922. Only there's a typo in Gynautocera, see below Prosopandrophila distincta.http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/zygaenoidea/zygaenidae/chalcosiinae/prosopandrophila/index.html. No papilionaria species there though. Check this http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/60_ZYGAENOIDEA/Zygaenidae/47_1%20Chalcosiinae/framepage%20Chalcosiinae%20N.html

28.11.2013 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Neither I found it on funet...... Bad search?

28.11.2013 17:35, Alexandr Zhakov

Can't find gender or species on the website on this. Or synonyms need to be added :)

28.11.2013 15:12, Alex Dumchus

Gynautocera papilionaria