Photo #30976: Nematopogon metaxella

09.08.2014 0:51, Peter Khramov

For those who wondered why the definition of the author Vasily and Irina are not - explained below. Basil, and I'll answer your question on the phone tomorrow. As for the FAQ and etc. descriptions and rules - the remark is correct, we will implement.

08.08.2014 22:44, Shamil Murtazin

OK! .. need somewhere to store the logic of behavior in similar situations of question ... I think somewhere it is written =)
FAQ or something.

08.08.2014 18:32, Peter Khramov

There have been questions about why the author of determination was made Basil, not Irina. Since initiative that decision came from me, explain the algorithm:

User A: I think it's kind of X, but I doubt it.
User B: I confirm this view H.
Define a user A.

User A: Here is the genus, species do not know, but I think that either X or Y.User B: Yes, this kind, and views of H.
Define a user B. For it was he who gave preference to a particular type, not the user A.

Ok?

07.08.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Photography was quite "restraint" to transport inaccurate.

07.08.2014 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Not identified → Nematopogon metaxella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.06.2014 0:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov

While writing comments, the definition has emerged. And the flight of time they perehlёstyvaetsya. Wait necessary.

27.06.2014 0:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Nematopogon metaxella? How about this version? It seems like no one no longer find of our own.

27.06.2014 0:27, Irina Nikulina

Some of Nematopogon. Comnevayus betweenNematopogon swammerdamellaandNematopogon metaxella