Photo #32116: Pyrausta virginalis

22.09.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I have sent you a letter. How about the proposal?

22.09.2014 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov

In the summer, when all travel and not near a computer, very easy to miss a message. Not sure of the definition, let hanging in uncertain why produce errors. :))

22.09.2014 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I ask a question about 2 months ago .....
Then I put in inaccurate.
Guys, I sketched version of communication (I hope you know where) :)

22.09.2014 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Pyrausta sanguinalis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Pyrausta virginalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2014 9:08, Alexandr Zhakov

Peter, right, we do not always understand the positions correct each other :)
I have no complaints about the definition of Andrew, I have a claim to the definition of Basil. :)
ThisPyrausta virginalis.

22.09.2014 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov

In Turkey, it is in full growth. Alexander, do you mean that the definition of Andrew wrong? I for certain reasons, have a hunch that there Proklov defined. Later, it will be necessary to ask Vlad.

22.09.2014 1:57, Alexandr Zhakov

Images of this kind of site is not :)

22.09.2014 1:31, Alexandr Zhakov

Vasily I of this butterfly for the first time no no 20 did not see when we start to define, and not to. I have not watched the options, but the image is very different from those already defined.

20.09.2014 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Not identified → Pyrausta sanguinalis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.09.2014 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I put in inaccurate. In the hope that someone - or something to confirm correct it.

01.08.2014 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I betPyrausta sanguinalis. Does anyone else have any views of anything?